Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Celeron E3300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Celeron E3300
100 %
2C / 2T · 2.50 GHz
4C / 4T · 2.45 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Celeron E3300
100 %
2C / 2T · 2.50 GHz
4C / 4T · 2.45 GHz
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron E3300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Celeron (165) | Qualcomm Snapdragon (105) |
| CPU group | Intel Celeron E3000 (3) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800/801 (2) |
| Architecture | Wolfdale (Penryn) | Krait 400 |
| Technology | 45 nm | 28 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | LGA 775 | |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron E3300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 2x Core | 4x Krait 400 |
| Frequency: | 2.50 GHz | 2.45 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | ||
| Turbo (All Cores): | ||
| L2-Cache | 1.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | ||
| Overclocking | ✓ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron E3300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | no iGPU | Qualcomm Adreno 330 |
| GPU frequency | ||
| CUs / Shader | / | / 32 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 0 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | ||
| Technology | 28 nm | |
| Release date | Q1/2013 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron E3300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Qualcomm AI engine | |
| AI specifications | Hexagon QDSP6 V5 | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron E3300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1066 (17.1 GB/s) DDR2-800 (12.8 GB/s) | LPDDR3-1866 (14.9 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | ||
| PCIe Bandwidth |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron E3300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron E3300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Android |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | Armv7-A (32 bit) |
| ISA extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 | |
| Release date | Q3/2009 | Q2/2013 |
| Release price | 47 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Celeron E3300 is 4.0 stars (2 ratings), while Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 has received 4.0 stars (8 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
3
Intel Celeron 450
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
4
Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
24C / 24T · 5.50 GHz
5
Intel Core i5-13600KF
14C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
6
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
8C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
7
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C / 28T · 3.30 GHz
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800
4C / 4T · 0.00 GHz
9
Intel Celeron E3300
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
