Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Celeron E3200 vs Intel Core i5-7600T
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Celeron E3200
35 %
2C / 2T · 2.40 GHz
Intel Core i5-7600T
100 %
4C / 4T · 3.70 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Celeron E3200
19 %
2C / 2T · 2.40 GHz
Intel Core i5-7600T
100 %
4C / 4T · 3.50 GHz
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Cinebench R11.5 iGPU
383 entries
383 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron E3200 | Intel Core i5-7600T |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Celeron (165) | Intel Core i5 (336) |
| CPU group | Intel Celeron E3000 (3) | Intel Core i 7000 (17) |
| Architecture | Wolfdale (Penryn) | Kaby Lake S |
| Technology | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Socket | LGA 775 | LGA 1151 |
| Predecessor | Intel Core i5-6600T | |
| Successor | Intel Core i5-8600T |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron E3200 | Intel Core i5-7600T |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 2x Core | 4x |
| Frequency: | 2.40 GHz | 2.80 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 3.70 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 3.50 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | 1.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 6.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✓ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron E3200 | Intel Core i5-7600T |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | no iGPU | Intel HD Graphics 630 |
| GPU frequency | 0.35 - 1.10 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | / | 24 / 192 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 64 GB | |
| Technology | 14 nm | |
| Release date | Q2/2016 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron E3200 | Intel Core i5-7600T |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron E3200 | Intel Core i5-7600T |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1066 (17.1 GB/s) DDR2-800 (12.8 GB/s) | DDR4-2400 (38.4 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 16 GB | 64 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 16 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 15.8 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron E3200 | Intel Core i5-7600T |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65 W | 35 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron E3200 | Intel Core i5-7600T |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Windows 10, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 |
| Release date | Q3/2009 | Q1/2017 |
| Release price | 47 $ | 235 $ |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Celeron E3200 is 5.0 stars (2 ratings), while Intel Core i5-7600T has received 4.8 stars (6 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Intel Celeron E3200
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
3
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
4
Intel Core i5-7600T
4C / 4T · 3.70 GHz
5
Intel Celeron 450
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
6
Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
24C / 24T · 5.50 GHz
7
Intel Core i5-13600KF
14C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
8
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
8C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
9
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C / 28T · 3.30 GHz
Popular Comparisons
