Intel Celeron E1600 vs MediaTek Helio X25
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Celeron E1600 | MediaTek Helio X25 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Celeron E1600 or MediaTek Helio X25 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Celeron E1600 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.40 GHz. Up to 16 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Celeron E1600 was released in Q2/2009. The MediaTek Helio X25 has 10 cores with 10 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.50 GHz. The CPU supports up to 4 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The MediaTek Helio X25 was released in Q4/2015. |
||
| Intel Celeron (165) | Family | Mediatek Helio (37) |
| Intel Celeron E1000 (4) | CPU group | MediaTek Helio X20 (4) |
| 1 | Generation | 2 |
| Conroe (Core) | Architecture | Cortex-A72 / Cortex-A53 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Celeron E1600 is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.40 GHz. The MediaTek Helio X25 has 10 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.50 GHz. |
||
| Intel Celeron E1600 | Characteristic | MediaTek Helio X25 |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 2 | Threads | 10 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.40 GHz 2x Core |
A-Core | 2.50 GHz 2x Cortex-A72 |
| -- | B-Core | 1.55 GHz 4x Cortex-A53 |
| -- | C-Core | -- 4x Cortex-A53 |
Internal GraphicsThe integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-T880 MP4 |
| GPU frequency | 0.85 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | 0.85 GHz |
| -- | GPU Generation | Midgard 4 |
| Technology | 16 nm | |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| -- | Compute units | 4 |
| -- | Shader | 64 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| -- | DirectX Version | 11 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-T880 MP4 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Celeron E1600 supports a maximum of 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The MediaTek Helio X25 can connect up to 4 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. |
||
| Intel Celeron E1600 | Characteristic | MediaTek Helio X25 |
| DDR3-1066, DDR2-800 | Memory | LPDDR3-800 |
| 16 GB | Max. Memory | 4 GB |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 17.1 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
| No | ECC | No |
| 0.50 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | -- |
| -- | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Intel Celeron E1600 has a TDP of 65 W, that of the MediaTek Helio X25 is --. |
||
| Intel Celeron E1600 | Characteristic | MediaTek Helio X25 |
| 65 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Celeron E1600 has a 0.50 MB cache, while the MediaTek Helio X25 cache has a total of 0.00 MB. |
||
| Intel Celeron E1600 | Characteristic | MediaTek Helio X25 |
| 65 nm | Technology | 20 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 | ISA extensions | -- |
| LGA 775 | Socket | -- |
| None | Virtualization | None |
| No | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q2/2009 | Release date | Q4/2015 |
| 58 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
2C 2T @ 2.40 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
10C 10T @ 2.50 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Celeron E1600
2C 2T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
|
MediaTek Helio X25
10C 10T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Celeron E1600
2C 2T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Helio X25
10C 10T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Celeron E1600
2C 2T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Helio X25
10C 10T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Intel Celeron E1600
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Helio X25
ARM Mali-T880 MP4 @ 0.85 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
Intel Celeron E1600
2C 2T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Helio X25
10C 10T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Celeron E1600 | MediaTek Helio X25 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
