Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Celeron 847 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
More benchmarks
Cinebench 2024 (SC)
427 entries
427 entries
Cinebench 2024 (MC)
422 entries
422 entries
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
AI performance (NPU)
218 entries
218 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron 847 | Intel Core Ultra 5 225F |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Celeron (165) | Intel Core Ultra 5 (35) |
| CPU group | Intel Celeron 800 (2) | Intel Core Ultra 200 AL-S (20) |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge U | Arrow Lake |
| Technology | 32 nm | 3 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Desktop |
| Socket | BGA 1023 | LGA 1851 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron 847 | Intel Core Ultra 5 225F |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 10 / 10 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 2x 1.10 GHz |
6x Lion Cove 3.30 - 4.90 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 4x Skymont 2.70 - 4.40 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 26.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 2.00 MB | 24.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron 847 | Intel Core Ultra 5 225F |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge GT1) | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | 0.35 - 0.80 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | 6 / 48 | / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | |
| Technology | 32 nm | |
| Release date | Q2/2011 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron 847 | Intel Core Ultra 5 225F |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Intel® AI Boost | |
| AI specifications | Intel AI Boost NPU 4 @ 13 TOPS | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU | 19 TOPS |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron 847 | Intel Core Ultra 5 225F |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1333 (21.3 GB/s) | DDR5-6400 (102.4 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 16 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | No | Yes |
| PCIe | 2.0 x 16 | 5.0 x 20 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 8.0 GB/s | 78.8 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron 847 | Intel Core Ultra 5 225F |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 17 W | 65 W |
| TDP (PL2) | 121 W | |
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 100 °C | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron 847 | Intel Core Ultra 5 225F |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Windows 11, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 |
| Release date | Q2/2011 | Q1/2025 |
| Release price | 134 $ | 221 $ |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Celeron 847 is 4.2 stars (13 ratings), while Intel Core Ultra 5 225F has received 4.3 stars (40 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
5
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
6
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
7
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
8
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
10C / 10T · 4.90 GHz
9
Intel Celeron 847
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
