Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Celeron 6305 vs Intel Processor N150
Last updated:
Summary
The Intel Celeron 6305 is based on the Tiger Lake U architecture and is manufactured using the 10 nm manufacturing process.
It is intended for basic desktop tasks. It features 4 MB of L3 cache and Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake G4). Core and thread counts are not specified in the provided information. The Intel Processor N150 utilizes the Twin Lake architecture and is produced using the more advanced 7 nm process.
This processor is also designed for energy-efficient entry-level solutions. It offers 4 MB of L2 cache, 6 MB of L3 cache, and Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs (Alder Lake). Again, core and thread specifications are not available. In performance comparison, the Intel Processor N150 shows significantly higher computing power.
In Geekbench 6 benchmarks, it clearly surpasses the Intel Celeron 6305 in single-core and multi-core performance by over 10 percent. This indicates improved responsiveness and multitasking. For gaming, both are only very limitedly suitable; the Intel Processor N150 offers marginal advantages here due to its more powerful integrated graphics and higher memory bandwidth.
Information on Thermal Design Power (TDP), specific power consumption, and market prices is not available. Thanks to newer manufacturing and superior benchmark results, the Intel Processor N150 offers higher overall performance and is the better choice for improved system responsiveness.
The Intel Celeron 6305 is suitable for extremely budget-oriented systems with minimal performance requirements.
It is intended for basic desktop tasks. It features 4 MB of L3 cache and Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake G4). Core and thread counts are not specified in the provided information. The Intel Processor N150 utilizes the Twin Lake architecture and is produced using the more advanced 7 nm process.
This processor is also designed for energy-efficient entry-level solutions. It offers 4 MB of L2 cache, 6 MB of L3 cache, and Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs (Alder Lake). Again, core and thread specifications are not available. In performance comparison, the Intel Processor N150 shows significantly higher computing power.
In Geekbench 6 benchmarks, it clearly surpasses the Intel Celeron 6305 in single-core and multi-core performance by over 10 percent. This indicates improved responsiveness and multitasking. For gaming, both are only very limitedly suitable; the Intel Processor N150 offers marginal advantages here due to its more powerful integrated graphics and higher memory bandwidth.
Information on Thermal Design Power (TDP), specific power consumption, and market prices is not available. Thanks to newer manufacturing and superior benchmark results, the Intel Processor N150 offers higher overall performance and is the better choice for improved system responsiveness.
The Intel Celeron 6305 is suitable for extremely budget-oriented systems with minimal performance requirements.
Intel Celeron 6305
- Tiger Lake U Architecture
- 10 nm manufacturing process
- 4 MB L3 Cache
- Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake G4)
Intel Processor N150
- Twin Lake Architecture
- 7 nm manufacturing process
- Higher computing performance (Benchmark)
- Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs (Alder Lake)
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Celeron 6305
68 %
2C / 2T · 1.80 GHz
Intel Processor N150
100 %
4C / 4T · 3.60 GHz
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Celeron 6305
54 %
2C / 2T · 1.80 GHz
Intel Processor N150
100 %
4C / 4T · 3.60 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Intel Celeron 6305
100 %
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48 EUs)
Intel Processor N150
53 %
Intel Graphics 32 EUs (Alder Lake)
More benchmarks
Cinebench 2024 (SC)
427 entries
427 entries
Cinebench 2024 (MC)
422 entries
422 entries
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron 6305 | Intel Processor N150 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Celeron (165) | Intel Processor N (9) |
| CPU group | Intel Celeron 6000 (2) | Intel Processor N150/N250 (2) |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake U | Twin Lake |
| Technology | 10 nm | 7 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Notebook |
| Socket | BGA 1449 | BGA 1264 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor | Intel Celeron 7305 |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron 6305 | Intel Processor N150 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 2x | 4x Gracemont |
| Frequency: | 1.80 GHz | 3.60 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 1.80 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 1.80 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | 4.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 4.00 MB | 6.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron 6305 | Intel Processor N150 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48 EUs) | Intel Graphics 32 EUs (Alder Lake) |
| GPU frequency | 0.30 - 1.25 GHz | 0.00 - 1.00 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 48 / 384 | 32 / 256 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 4 | 3 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 96 GB | 16 GB |
| Technology | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Release date | Q3/2020 | Q1/2020 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron 6305 | Intel Processor N150 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron 6305 | Intel Processor N150 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR4-3200 (51.2 GB/s) LPDDR4-3733 (29.8 GB/s) | DDR5-4800 (38.4 GB/s) LPDDR5-4800 (38.4 GB/s) DDR4-3200 (25.6 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 1 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 16 | 3.0 x 9 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 15.8 GB/s | 8.9 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron 6305 | Intel Processor N150 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15 W | 10 W |
| TDP (PL2) | 25 W | |
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 100 °C | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron 6305 | Intel Processor N150 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 11, Linux | |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2 |
| Release date | Q4/2020 | Q4/2024 |
| Release price | 128 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Celeron 6305 is 3.5 stars (11 ratings), while Intel Processor N150 has received 4.0 stars (300 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M4 (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 4.46 GHz
7
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
8
Intel Processor N150
4C / 4T · 0.00 GHz
9
Intel Celeron 6305
2C / 2T · 1.80 GHz
Popular Comparisons
