Intel Celeron 430 vs AMD EPYC 8434PN
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Celeron 430 | AMD EPYC 8434PN | |
CPU comparisonIntel Celeron 430 or AMD EPYC 8434PN - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Celeron 430 has 1 cores with 1 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.80 GHz. Up to 16 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Celeron 430 was released in Q2/2007. The AMD EPYC 8434PN has 48 cores with 96 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.00 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 6 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 8434PN was released in Q3/2023. |
||
| Intel Celeron (165) | Family | AMD EPYC (129) |
| Intel Celeron 400 (4) | CPU group | AMD EPYC 8004/9004 (15) |
| 1 | Generation | 4 |
| Conroe (Core) | Architecture | Bergamo/Siena (Zen 4c) |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Celeron 430 has 1 CPU cores and can calculate 1 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Celeron 430 is 1.80 GHz while the AMD EPYC 8434PN has 48 CPU cores and 96 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 8434PN is at 2.00 GHz (3.00 GHz). |
||
| Intel Celeron 430 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 8434PN |
| 1 | Cores | 48 |
| 1 | Threads | 96 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 1.80 GHz | Frequency | 2.00 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.00 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 3.00 GHz |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Celeron 430 can use up to 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 17.1 GB/s. The AMD EPYC 8434PN supports up to GB of memory in 6 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 230.4 GB/s. |
||
| Intel Celeron 430 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 8434PN |
| DDR3-1066, DDR2-800 | Memory | DDR5-4800 |
| 16 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 6 (Hexa Channel) |
| 17.1 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 230.4 GB/s |
| No | ECC | Yes |
| 0.50 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 128.00 MB |
| -- | PCIe version | 5.0 |
| -- | PCIe lanes | 96 |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | 378.0 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Celeron 430 is 35 W, while the AMD EPYC 8434PN has a TDP of 155 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| Intel Celeron 430 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 8434PN |
| 35 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 155 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Celeron 430 is manufactured in 65 nm and has 0.50 MB cache. The AMD EPYC 8434PN is manufactured in 5 nm and has a 128.00 MB cache. |
||
| Intel Celeron 430 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 8434PN |
| 65 nm | Technology | 5 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 | ISA extensions | SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI |
| LGA 775 | Socket | SP6 |
| None | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| No | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 |
| Q2/2007 | Release date | Q3/2023 |
| -- | Release price | 3150 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
1C 1T @ 1.80 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
48C 96T @ 2.00 GHz (3.00 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Celeron 430
1C 1T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
|
AMD EPYC 8434PN
48C 96T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Celeron 430
1C 1T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 8434PN
48C 96T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Celeron 430
1C 1T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 8434PN
48C 96T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Celeron 430 | AMD EPYC 8434PN |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
