Intel Celeron 3765U vs AMD EPYC 7452

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Intel Celeron 3765U CPU1 vs CPU2 AMD EPYC 7452
Intel Celeron 3765U AMD EPYC 7452

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the Intel Celeron 3765U and the AMD EPYC 7452 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the Intel Celeron 3765U 2 core processor released in Q2/2015 with the AMD EPYC 7452 which has 32 CPU cores and was introduced in Q3/2019.
Intel Celeron (165) Family AMD EPYC (129)
Intel Celeron 3000 (10) CPU group AMD EPYC 7002 (24)
7 Generation 2
Kaby Lake U Architecture Rome (Zen 2)
Mobile Segment Desktop / Server
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor AMD EPYC 7453

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Intel Celeron 3765U is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.90 GHz. The processor can compute 2 threads at the same time. The AMD EPYC 7452 clocks with 2.35 GHz (3.35 GHz), has 32 CPU cores and can calculate 64 threads in parallel.

Intel Celeron 3765U Characteristic AMD EPYC 7452
2 Cores 32
2 Threads 64
normal Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading Yes
No Overclocking ? No
1.90 GHz Frequency 2.35 GHz
-- Turbo Frequency (1 Core) 3.35 GHz
-- Turbo Frequency (All Cores) 2.65 GHz

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

Intel Celeron 3765U Characteristic AMD EPYC 7452
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell GT1) GPU no iGPU
0.10 GHz GPU frequency --
0.80 GHz GPU (Turbo) --
8 GPU Generation --
14 nm Technology
3 Max. displays
12 Compute units --
96 Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
2 GB Max. GPU Memory --
11.2 DirectX Version --

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell GT1) GPU no iGPU
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 No
No Codec VP9 No
Decode Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
Decode / Encode Codec AVC No
Decode Codec VC-1 No
Decode Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

Up to 16 GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the Intel Celeron 3765U, while the AMD EPYC 7452 supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s enabled.

Intel Celeron 3765U Characteristic AMD EPYC 7452
LPDDR3-1600, DDR3L-1600 Memory DDR4-3200
16 GB Max. Memory
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 8 (Octa Channel)
25.6 GB/s Max. Bandwidth 51.2 GB/s
No ECC Yes
-- L2 Cache --
2.00 MB L3 Cache 128.00 MB
2.0 PCIe version 4.0
12 PCIe lanes 128
6.0 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth 252.0 GB/s

Thermal Management

The Intel Celeron 3765U has a TDP of 15 W. The TDP of the AMD EPYC 7452 is 155 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

Intel Celeron 3765U Characteristic AMD EPYC 7452
15 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 155 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
10 W TDP down --
105 °C Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Intel Celeron 3765U has 2.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 14 nm. The cache of AMD EPYC 7452 is at 128.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 7 nm.

Intel Celeron 3765U Characteristic AMD EPYC 7452
14 nm Technology 7 nm
Monolithic Chip design Chiplet
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2 ISA extensions SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
BGA 1168 Socket SP3
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization AMD-V, SVM
Yes AES-NI Yes
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q2/2015 Release date Q3/2019
-- Release price 3250 $
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Intel Celeron 3765U to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the AMD EPYC 7452 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3765U (40%)
AMD EPYC 7452 (100%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 3 CPU benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3765U (4%)
AMD EPYC 7452 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Celeron 3765U Intel Celeron 3765U
2C 2T @ 1.90 GHz
443 (46%)
AMD EPYC 7452 AMD EPYC 7452
32C 64T @ 3.35 GHz
968 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Celeron 3765U Intel Celeron 3765U
2C 2T @ 1.90 GHz
868 (3%)
AMD EPYC 7452 AMD EPYC 7452
32C 64T @ 2.65 GHz
26314 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Intel Celeron 3765U Intel Celeron 3765U
2C 2T @ 1.90 GHz
370 (33%)
AMD EPYC 7452 AMD EPYC 7452
32C 64T @ 3.35 GHz
1134 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
Intel Celeron 3765U Intel Celeron 3765U
2C 2T @ 1.90 GHz
642 (5%)
AMD EPYC 7452 AMD EPYC 7452
32C 64T @ 2.65 GHz
12845 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Intel Celeron 3765U Intel Celeron 3765U
2C 2T @ 1.90 GHz
1265 (3%)
AMD EPYC 7452 AMD EPYC 7452
32C 64T @ 2.65 GHz
41873 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Celeron 3765U Intel Celeron 3765U
2C 2T @ 1.90 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD EPYC 7452 AMD EPYC 7452
32C 64T @ 3.35 GHz
391 (100%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Intel Celeron 3765U Intel Celeron 3765U
Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell GT1) @ 0.80 GHz
154 (100%)
AMD EPYC 7452 AMD EPYC 7452
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Celeron 3765U Intel Celeron 3765U
2C 2T @ 1.90 GHz
77 (100%)
AMD EPYC 7452 AMD EPYC 7452
32C 64T @ 3.35 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Celeron 3765U Intel Celeron 3765U
2C 2T @ 1.90 GHz
148 (100%)
AMD EPYC 7452 AMD EPYC 7452
32C 64T @ 2.65 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

Intel Celeron 3765U AMD EPYC 7452
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. AMD EPYC 7452Intel Xeon Platinum 8276 AMD EPYC 7452 vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8276
2. Intel Celeron 3765UIntel Celeron J1900 Intel Celeron 3765U vs Intel Celeron J1900
3. AMD EPYC 7452AMD EPYC 7502 AMD EPYC 7452 vs AMD EPYC 7502
4. AMD EPYC 7452AMD EPYC 7542 AMD EPYC 7452 vs AMD EPYC 7542
5. AMD A8-7100Intel Celeron 3765U AMD A8-7100 vs Intel Celeron 3765U
6. Intel Celeron 3765UIntel Celeron 3755U Intel Celeron 3765U vs Intel Celeron 3755U
7. Intel Core i3-5010UIntel Celeron 3765U Intel Core i3-5010U vs Intel Celeron 3765U
8. Intel Celeron 3765UIntel Core i7-5850HQ Intel Celeron 3765U vs Intel Core i7-5850HQ
9. AMD FX-8350Intel Celeron 3765U AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Celeron 3765U
10. Intel Pentium G3460Intel Celeron 3765U Intel Pentium G3460 vs Intel Celeron 3765U


back to index