Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Celeron 3215U vs Intel Core2 Duo E6750
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Celeron 3215U
100 %
2C / 2T · 1.70 GHz
2C / 2T · 2.66 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Celeron 3215U
100 %
2C / 2T · 1.70 GHz
2C / 2T · 2.66 GHz
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Cinebench R11.5 iGPU
383 entries
383 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron 3215U | Intel Core2 Duo E6750 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Celeron (165) | Intel Core2 Duo (29) |
| CPU group | Intel Celeron 3000 (10) | Intel Core 2 Duo E4000/E6000 (15) |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake U | Conroe (Core) |
| Technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Desktop |
| Socket | BGA 1168 | LGA 775 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron 3215U | Intel Core2 Duo E6750 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 2x | 2x |
| Frequency: | 1.70 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | ||
| Turbo (All Cores): | ||
| L2-Cache | 4.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 2.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✓ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron 3215U | Intel Core2 Duo E6750 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell GT1) | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | 0.10 - 0.80 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | 12 / 96 | / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | |
| Technology | 14 nm | |
| Release date | Q1/2015 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron 3215U | Intel Core2 Duo E6750 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron 3215U | Intel Core2 Duo E6750 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3L-1600 (25.6 GB/s) LPDDR3-1600 (12.8 GB/s) | DDR3-1333 (21.3 GB/s) DDR2-1066 (17.1 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 2.0 x 12 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 6.0 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron 3215U | Intel Core2 Duo E6750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15 W | 65 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | 10 W | |
| T. junction max. | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron 3215U | Intel Core2 Duo E6750 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Windows 10, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 |
| Release date | Q2/2015 | Q3/2007 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Celeron 3215U is 3.4 stars (7 ratings), while Intel Core2 Duo E6750 has received 4.0 stars (3 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
5
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
6
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
7
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
8
Intel Core2 Duo E6750
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
9
Intel Celeron 3215U
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
