Intel Atom N475 vs MediaTek MT8317T

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Intel Atom N475 CPU1 vs CPU2 MediaTek MT8317T
Intel Atom N475 MediaTek MT8317T

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the Intel Atom N475 and the MediaTek MT8317T and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the Intel Atom N475 1 core processor released in Q1/2010 with the MediaTek MT8317T which has 2 CPU cores and was introduced in Q3/2013.
Intel Atom (108) Family Mediatek MT-Serie (72)
Intel Atom N400/N500 (3) CPU group MediaTek MT83xx A9 (3)
2 Generation 1
Pineview Architecture Cortex-A9
Desktop / Server Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Intel Atom N475 is a 1 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.83 GHz. The processor can compute 2 threads at the same time. The MediaTek MT8317T clocks with 1.20 GHz, has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 2 threads in parallel.

Intel Atom N475 Characteristic MediaTek MT8317T
1 Cores 2
2 Threads 2
normal Core architecture normal
Yes Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
1.83 GHz Frequency 1.20 GHz
-- Turbo Frequency (1 Core) --
-- Turbo Frequency (All Cores) --

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

Intel Atom N475 Characteristic MediaTek MT8317T
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

Intel GMA 3150 GPU PowerVR SGX531
0.20 GHz GPU frequency 0.52 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) 0.52 GHz
-- GPU Generation --
45 Technology 65nm
0 Max. displays 1
2 Compute units 1
-- Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
1 GB Max. GPU Memory --
-- DirectX Version 10.1

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

Intel GMA 3150 GPU PowerVR SGX531
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
No Codec h264 No
No Codec VP9 No
No Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC No
No Codec VC-1 No
No Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

Up to 2 GB of memory in a maximum of 1 memory channels is supported by the Intel Atom N475, while the MediaTek MT8317T supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of -- enabled.

Intel Atom N475 Characteristic MediaTek MT8317T
DDR3-800, DDR2-800 Memory
2 GB Max. Memory
1 (Single Channel) Memory channels 0
6.4 GB/s Max. Bandwidth --
No ECC No
0.50 MB L2 Cache --
-- L3 Cache --
-- PCIe version --
-- PCIe lanes --
-- PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The Intel Atom N475 has a TDP of 6.5 W. The TDP of the MediaTek MT8317T is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

Intel Atom N475 Characteristic MediaTek MT8317T
6.5 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
100 °C Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Intel Atom N475 has 0.50 MB cache and is manufactured in 45 nm. The cache of MediaTek MT8317T is at 0.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 40 nm.

Intel Atom N475 Characteristic MediaTek MT8317T
45 nm Technology 40 nm
Monolithic Chip design Chiplet
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv7-A (32 bit)
MMX, SSE3, SSSE3 ISA extensions --
BGA 559 Socket --
None Virtualization None
No AES-NI No
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Android
Q1/2010 Release date Q3/2013
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Intel Atom N475 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 5.0 stars (1 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the MediaTek MT8317T to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Intel Atom N475 Intel Atom N475
Intel GMA 3150 @ 0.20 GHz
0 (0%)
MediaTek MT8317T MediaTek MT8317T
PowerVR SGX531 @ 0.52 GHz
4 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Intel Atom N475 Intel Atom N475
1C 2T @ 1.83 GHz
179 (100%)
MediaTek MT8317T MediaTek MT8317T
2C 2T @ 1.20 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

Intel Atom N475 MediaTek MT8317T
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. MediaTek MT8167AMediaTek MT8317T MediaTek MT8167A vs MediaTek MT8317T
2. MediaTek MT8317TMediaTek MT6577 MediaTek MT8317T vs MediaTek MT6577
3. MediaTek Dimensity 920MediaTek MT8317T MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs MediaTek MT8317T
4. MediaTek Helio P10MediaTek MT8317T MediaTek Helio P10 vs MediaTek MT8317T
5. MediaTek MT8317TMediaTek MT8735 MediaTek MT8317T vs MediaTek MT8735
6. MediaTek MT6575MediaTek MT8317T MediaTek MT6575 vs MediaTek MT8317T
7. MediaTek MT8317TSamsung Exynos 5260 MediaTek MT8317T vs Samsung Exynos 5260
8. Qualcomm Snapdragon 439MediaTek MT8317T Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 vs MediaTek MT8317T
9. MediaTek MT8317TIntel Xeon D-2738 MediaTek MT8317T vs Intel Xeon D-2738
10. MediaTek MT8317TIntel Xeon D-1540 MediaTek MT8317T vs Intel Xeon D-1540


back to index