Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Atom D2500 vs AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Atom D2500
7 %
2C / 2T · 1.86 GHz
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D
100 %
8C / 16T · 4.10 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Atom D2500
2 %
2C / 2T · 1.86 GHz
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D
100 %
8C / 16T · 3.00 GHz
More benchmarks
Cinebench 2026 (ST)
218 entries
218 entries
Cinebench 2026 (MC)
219 entries
219 entries
Cinebench 2024 (SC)
427 entries
427 entries
Cinebench 2024 (MC)
422 entries
422 entries
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom D2500 | AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Atom (108) | AMD Ryzen 7 (79) |
| CPU group | Intel Atom D2000 (4) | AMD Ryzen 5000 (17) |
| Architecture | Cedarview | Vermeer (Zen 3) |
| Technology | 32 nm | 7 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Socket | BGA 559 | AM4 (PGA 1331) |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom D2500 | AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 8 / 16 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✓ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 2x | 8x Zen 3 |
| Frequency: | 1.86 GHz | 3.00 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 4.10 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | ||
| L2-Cache | 4.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 1.00 MB | 96.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom D2500 | AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel GMA 3600 | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | 0.40 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | 4 / 32 | / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 1 GB | |
| Technology | 65 nm | |
| Release date | Q4/2008 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom D2500 | AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom D2500 | AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1066 (8.6 GB/s) | DDR4-3200 (51.2 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 4 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory channels | 1 | 2 |
| ECC | No | Yes |
| PCIe | 4.0 x 20 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 39.4 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom D2500 | AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10 W | 105 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 90 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom D2500 | AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE3 | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 |
| Release date | Q3/2011 | Q1/2024 |
| Release price | 50 $ | 249 $ |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Atom D2500 is 0 stars (0 ratings), while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D has received 4.6 stars (190 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
3
Intel Celeron 450
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
4
Intel Core i5-13600KF
14C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
8C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
6
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C / 28T · 3.30 GHz
7
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
8C / 16T · 4.60 GHz
8
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D
8C / 16T · 4.10 GHz
9
Intel Atom D2500
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
