Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Atom C5315 vs Intel Xeon w9-3595X
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Atom C5315
20 %
4C / 4T · 2.40 GHz
Intel Xeon w9-3595X
100 %
60C / 120T · 4.80 GHz
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Atom C5315
6 %
4C / 4T · 2.40 GHz
Intel Xeon w9-3595X
100 %
60C / 120T · 2.00 GHz
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C5315 | Intel Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Atom (108) | Intel Xeon W (97) |
| CPU group | Intel Atom CE5300 (2) | Intel Xeon W-3400/3500 (15) |
| Architecture | Berryville | Sapphire Rapids-WS |
| Technology | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Enterprise / Embedded |
| Socket | BGA 2106 | LGA 4677 |
| Predecessor | Intel Xeon w9-3495X | |
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C5315 | Intel Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 60 / 120 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✓ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 4x | 60x |
| Frequency: | 2.40 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 4.80 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | ||
| L2-Cache | 9.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 112.50 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✓ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C5315 | Intel Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | no iGPU | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | ||
| CUs / Shader | / | / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | ||
| Max. GPU Memory | ||
| Technology | ||
| Release date |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C5315 | Intel Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Intel® AI Boost | |
| AI specifications | Intel® Deep Learning Boost | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C5315 | Intel Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR4-2400 (38.4 GB/s) | DDR5-4800 (307.2 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 256 GB | 4096 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 8 |
| ECC | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 12 | 5.0 x 112 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 11.8 GB/s | 441.1 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C5315 | Intel Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 38 W | 385 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | 462 W | |
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 100 °C | 100 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C5315 | Intel Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 11, Windows Server, Linux | |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | Unknown | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, AMX |
| Release date | Q2/2022 | Q3/2024 |
| Release price | 5889 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Atom C5315 is 0 stars (0 ratings), while Intel Xeon w9-3595X has received 3.2 stars (5 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
3
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
4
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
7
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
8
Intel Xeon w9-3595X
60C / 120T · 4.80 GHz
9
Intel Atom C5315
4C / 4T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
