Intel Atom C5125 vs AMD EPYC 7302P
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Atom C5125 | AMD EPYC 7302P | |
CPU comparisonIntel Atom C5125 or AMD EPYC 7302P - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Atom C5125 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.80 GHz. Up to 256 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Atom C5125 was released in Q2/2022. The AMD EPYC 7302P has 16 cores with 32 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.30 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7302P was released in Q3/2019. |
||
| Intel Atom (108) | Family | AMD EPYC (129) |
| Intel Atom C5000 (5) | CPU group | AMD EPYC 7002 (24) |
| 6 | Generation | 2 |
| Parker Ridge | Architecture | Rome (Zen 2) |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Atom C5125 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.80 GHz. The AMD EPYC 7302P has 16 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 3.00 GHz (3.30 GHz). |
||
| Intel Atom C5125 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7302P |
| 8 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.80 GHz | Frequency | 3.00 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.30 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 3.20 GHz |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Atom C5125 supports a maximum of 256 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7302P can connect up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels. |
||
| Intel Atom C5125 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7302P |
| DDR4-2933 | Memory | DDR4-3200 |
| 256 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 8 (Octa Channel) |
| 46.9 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | Yes |
| 9.00 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 128.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | 4.0 |
| 32 | PCIe lanes | 128 |
| 31.5 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | 252.0 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Intel Atom C5125 has a TDP of 50 W, that of the AMD EPYC 7302P is 155 W. |
||
| Intel Atom C5125 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7302P |
| 50 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 155 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| 100 °C | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Atom C5125 has a 9.00 MB cache, while the AMD EPYC 7302P cache has a total of 128.00 MB. |
||
| Intel Atom C5125 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7302P |
| 10 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, Intel QAT | ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 |
| BGA 2106 | Socket | SP3 |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q2/2022 | Release date | Q3/2019 |
| -- | Release price | 2850 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
16C 32T @ 3.00 GHz (3.30 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 0 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
Intel Atom C5125
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
|
AMD EPYC 7302P
16C 32T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Atom C5125
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7302P
16C 32T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Atom C5125
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7302P
16C 32T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
Intel Atom C5125
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7302P
16C 32T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
|
Intel Atom C5125
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7302P
16C 32T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Atom C5125
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7302P
16C 32T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Atom C5125 | AMD EPYC 7302P |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
