Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
AMD EPYC 7302 vs AMD EPYC 7302P
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD EPYC 7302 | AMD EPYC 7302P | |
CPU comparisonAMD EPYC 7302 or AMD EPYC 7302P - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD EPYC 7302 has 16 cores with 32 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.30 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7302 was released in Q3/2019. The AMD EPYC 7302P has 16 cores with 32 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.30 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7302P was released in Q3/2019. |
||
| AMD EPYC (129) | Family | AMD EPYC (129) |
| AMD EPYC 7002 (24) | CPU group | AMD EPYC 7002 (24) |
| 2 | Generation | 2 |
| Rome (Zen 2) | Architecture | Rome (Zen 2) |
| Server | Segment | Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD EPYC 7302 has 16 CPU cores and can calculate 32 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 7302 is 3.00 GHz (3.30 GHz) while the AMD EPYC 7302P has 16 CPU cores and 32 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 7302P is at 3.00 GHz (3.30 GHz). |
||
| AMD EPYC 7302 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7302P |
| 16 | Cores | 16 |
| 32 | Threads | 32 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 3.00 GHz | Frequency | 3.00 GHz |
| 3.30 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.30 GHz |
| 3.20 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 3.20 GHz |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD EPYC 7302 can use up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 51.2 GB/s. The AMD EPYC 7302P supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 51.2 GB/s. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7302 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7302P |
| DDR4-3200 | Memory | DDR4-3200 |
| Max. Memory | ||
| 8 (Octa Channel) | Memory channels | 8 (Octa Channel) |
| 51.2 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 128.00 MB | L3 Cache | 128.00 MB |
| 4.0 | PCIe version | 4.0 |
| 128 | PCIe lanes | 128 |
| 252.0 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | 252.0 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD EPYC 7302 is 155 W, while the AMD EPYC 7302P has a TDP of 155 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7302 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7302P |
| 155 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 155 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD EPYC 7302 is manufactured in 7 nm and has 128.00 MB cache. The AMD EPYC 7302P is manufactured in 7 nm and has a 128.00 MB cache. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7302 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7302P |
| 7 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 | ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 |
| SP3 | Socket | SP3 |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q3/2019 | Release date | Q3/2019 |
| 2850 $ | Release price | 2850 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
16C 32T @ 3.00 GHz (3.30 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
16C 32T @ 3.00 GHz (3.30 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 3 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 3 CPU benchmarks
Price-performance ratio
Geekbench 6 multi-core score divided by the processor's release price. Higher is better.
|
AMD EPYC 7302
Geekbench 6 MT: 10,254 / 2850 $ |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7302P
Geekbench 6 MT: 11,563 / 2850 $ |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a partial load benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. In the single-core test, only the fastest CPU core is measured. The test run simulates the performance in practice.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7302
16C 32T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7302P
16C 32T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
The practical Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark tests the system's performance under partial load. The processor's maximum power consumption is far from being used up.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7302
16C 32T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7302P
16C 32T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7302
16C 32T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7302P
16C 32T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7302
16C 32T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7302P
16C 32T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7302
16C 32T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7302P
16C 32T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7302
16C 32T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7302P
16C 32T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD EPYC 7302 | AMD EPYC 7302P |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index