Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Atom C2730 vs Intel Celeron N3450
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Multi-core performance
Intel Atom C2730
100 %
8C / 8T · 2.40 GHz
Intel Celeron N3450
66 %
4C / 4T · 2.20 GHz
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Cinebench R11.5 iGPU
383 entries
383 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C2730 | Intel Celeron N3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Atom (108) | Intel Celeron (165) |
| CPU group | Intel Atom C2000 (7) | Intel Celeron J3000/N3000 (10) |
| Architecture | Avoton | Braswell |
| Technology | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Notebook |
| Socket | BGA 1283 | BGA 1296 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C2730 | Intel Celeron N3450 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 8x | 4x |
| Frequency: | 1.70 GHz | 1.10 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 2.40 GHz | 2.20 GHz |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 2.40 GHz | 2.20 GHz |
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 4.00 MB | 2.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C2730 | Intel Celeron N3450 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | no iGPU | Intel HD Graphics 500 |
| GPU frequency | 0.20 - 0.70 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | / | 12 / 96 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 8 GB | |
| Technology | 14 nm | |
| Release date | Q3/2016 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C2730 | Intel Celeron N3450 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C2730 | Intel Celeron N3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3L-1600 (25.6 GB/s) DDR3-1600 (25.6 GB/s) | LPDDR4-2400 (29.9 GB/s) LPDDR3-1866 (29.9 GB/s) DDR3L-1866 (29.9 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 32 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | Yes | No |
| PCIe | 2.0 x 8 | 2.0 x 6 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 4.0 GB/s | 3.0 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C2730 | Intel Celeron N3450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 12 W | 6 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | 4 W | |
| T. junction max. | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C2730 | Intel Celeron N3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Windows 10, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 |
| Release date | Q3/2013 | Q3/2016 |
| Release price | 130 $ | 107 $ |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Atom C2730 is 0 stars (0 ratings), while Intel Celeron N3450 has received 3.6 stars (13 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
3
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
4
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
5
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
6
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
7
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
8
Intel Celeron N3450
4C / 4T · 2.20 GHz
9
Intel Atom C2730
8C / 8T · 2.40 GHz
Popular Comparisons
