Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Atom C2350 vs AMD EPYC 7702P
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Atom C2350
11 %
2C / 2T · 2.00 GHz
AMD EPYC 7702P
100 %
64C / 128T · 3.35 GHz
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Atom C2350
2 %
2C / 2T · 2.00 GHz
AMD EPYC 7702P
100 %
64C / 128T · 2.50 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Atom C2350
18 %
2C / 2T · 2.00 GHz
AMD EPYC 7702P
100 %
64C / 128T · 3.35 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Atom C2350
1 %
2C / 2T · 2.00 GHz
AMD EPYC 7702P
100 %
64C / 128T · 2.50 GHz
More benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
Monero Hashrate
94 entries
94 entries
V-Ray CPU-Render
251 entries
251 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C2350 | AMD EPYC 7702P |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Atom (108) | AMD EPYC (147) |
| CPU group | Intel Atom C2000 (7) | AMD EPYC 7002 (25) |
| Architecture | Avoton | Rome (Zen 2) |
| Technology | 22 nm | 7 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Server |
| Socket | BGA 1283 | SP3 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C2350 | AMD EPYC 7702P |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 64 / 128 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✓ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 2x | 64x |
| Frequency: | 1.70 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 2.00 GHz | 3.35 GHz |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 2.00 GHz | 2.50 GHz |
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 1.00 MB | 256.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C2350 | AMD EPYC 7702P |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | no iGPU | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | ||
| CUs / Shader | / | / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | ||
| Max. GPU Memory | ||
| Technology | ||
| Release date |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C2350 | AMD EPYC 7702P |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C2350 | AMD EPYC 7702P |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1333 (10.7 GB/s) | DDR4-3200 (51.2 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 16 GB | |
| Memory channels | 1 | 8 |
| ECC | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe | 2.0 x 4 | 4.0 x 128 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 2.0 GB/s | 252.0 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C2350 | AMD EPYC 7702P |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 6 W | 200 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C2350 | AMD EPYC 7702P |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Windows 10, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 |
| Release date | Q3/2013 | Q3/2019 |
| Release price | 39 $ | 7500 $ |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Atom C2350 is 3.0 stars (2 ratings), while AMD EPYC 7702P has received 5.0 stars (1 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
AMD EPYC 7702P
64C / 128T · 3.35 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
3
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
4
Intel Celeron 450
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
5
Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
24C / 24T · 5.50 GHz
6
Intel Core i5-13600KF
14C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
8C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
8
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C / 28T · 3.30 GHz
9
Intel Atom C2350
2C / 2T · 2.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
