HiSilicon Kirin 910 vs MediaTek Helio P95
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| HiSilicon Kirin 910 | MediaTek Helio P95 | |
CPU comparisonIn this CPU comparison, we compare the HiSilicon Kirin 910 and the MediaTek Helio P95 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the HiSilicon Kirin 910 4 core processor released in Q1/2014 with the MediaTek Helio P95 which has 8 CPU cores and was introduced in Q1/2020. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin (29) | Family | Mediatek Helio (37) |
| HiSilicon Kirin 910 (2) | CPU group | MediaTek Helio P65/P90/P95 (3) |
| 1 | Generation | 3 |
| Cortex-A9 | Architecture | Cortex-A75 / Cortex-A55 |
| Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | MediaTek Helio P90 |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe HiSilicon Kirin 910 is a 4 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.60 GHz. The processor can compute 4 threads at the same time. The MediaTek Helio P95 clocks with 2.20 GHz, has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 910 | Characteristic | MediaTek Helio P95 |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 1.60 GHz 4x Cortex-A9 |
A-Core | 2.20 GHz 2x Cortex-A75 |
| -- | B-Core | 2.00 GHz 6x Cortex-A55 |
Internal GraphicsGraphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback. |
||
| ARM Mali-450 MP4 | GPU | PowerVR GM 9446 |
| 0.53 GHz | GPU frequency | 0.95 GHz |
| 0.53 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| Utgard | GPU Generation | 1 |
| 28nm | Technology | 12 |
| 1 | Max. displays | 0 |
| 4 | Compute units | 3 |
| 64 | Shader | 12 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB |
| 0 | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| ARM Mali-450 MP4 | GPU | PowerVR GM 9446 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeUp to GB of memory in a maximum of 1 memory channels is supported by the HiSilicon Kirin 910, while the MediaTek Helio P95 supports a maximum of 8 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s enabled. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 910 | Characteristic | MediaTek Helio P95 |
| LPDDR3 | Memory | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| Max. Memory | 8 GB | |
| 1 (Single Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| -- | Max. Bandwidth | 14.9 GB/s |
| No | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | -- |
| -- | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe HiSilicon Kirin 910 has a TDP of --. The TDP of the MediaTek Helio P95 is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 910 | Characteristic | MediaTek Helio P95 |
| -- | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe HiSilicon Kirin 910 has 0.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 28 nm. The cache of MediaTek Helio P95 is at 0.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 12 nm. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 910 | Characteristic | MediaTek Helio P95 |
| 28 nm | Technology | 12 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Chiplet |
| Armv7-A (32 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| -- | ISA extensions | -- |
| -- | Socket | -- |
| None | Virtualization | None |
| No | AES-NI | No |
| Android | Operating systems | Android |
| Q1/2014 | Release date | Q1/2020 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
4C 4T @ 1.60 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
HiSilicon Kirin 910
ARM Mali-450 MP4 @ 0.53 GHz |
||
|
MediaTek Helio P95
PowerVR GM 9446 @ 0.95 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 910
4C 4T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Helio P95
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 910
4C 4T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Helio P95
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 9 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 910
4C 4T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Helio P95
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 910
4C 4T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Helio P95
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| HiSilicon Kirin 910 | MediaTek Helio P95 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
