HiSilicon Kirin 9000E vs AMD EPYC 9124
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| HiSilicon Kirin 9000E | AMD EPYC 9124 | |
CPU comparisonHiSilicon Kirin 9000E or AMD EPYC 9124 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The HiSilicon Kirin 9000E has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.13 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 4 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000E was released in Q4/2020. The AMD EPYC 9124 has 16 cores with 32 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.70 GHz. The CPU supports up to 6144 GB of memory in 12 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 9124 was released in Q4/2022. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin (29) | Family | AMD EPYC (129) |
| HiSilicon Kirin 9000 (2) | CPU group | AMD EPYC 9004 (21) |
| 9 | Generation | 4 |
| Cortex-A77 / Cortex-A55 | Architecture | Genoa / Genoa-X (Zen 4) |
| Mobile | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe HiSilicon Kirin 9000E has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E is 3.13 GHz while the AMD EPYC 9124 has 16 CPU cores and 32 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 9124 is at 3.00 GHz (3.70 GHz). |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 9000E | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 9124 |
| 8 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 3.13 GHz 1x Cortex-A77 |
A-Core | 3.00 GHz (3.70 GHz) 16x Zen 4 |
| 2.54 GHz 3x Cortex-A77 |
B-Core | -- |
| 2.05 GHz 4x Cortex-A55 |
C-Core | -- |
Internal GraphicsThe HiSilicon Kirin 9000E or AMD EPYC 9124 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| ARM Mali-G78 MP22 | GPU | no iGPU |
| 0.76 GHz | GPU frequency | -- |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| Vallhall 2 | GPU Generation | -- |
| 5 nm | Technology | |
| 1 | Max. displays | |
| 22 | Compute units | -- |
| 352 | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 12 | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| ARM Mali-G78 MP22 | GPU | no iGPU |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP9 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP8 | No |
| Decode | Codec AV1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec AVC | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VC-1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe HiSilicon Kirin 9000E can use up to GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is --. The AMD EPYC 9124 supports up to 6144 GB of memory in 12 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 460.8 GB/s. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 9000E | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 9124 |
| LPDDR5-2750, LPDDR4X-2133 | Memory | DDR5-4800 |
| Max. Memory | 6144 GB | |
| 4 (Quad Channel) | Memory channels | 12 |
| -- | Max. Bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s |
| No | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | 16.00 MB |
| -- | L3 Cache | 64.00 MB |
| -- | PCIe version | 5.0 |
| -- | PCIe lanes | 128 |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | 504.1 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E is --, while the AMD EPYC 9124 has a TDP of 200 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 9000E | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 9124 |
| -- | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 200 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | 240 W |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | 100 °C |
Technical detailsThe HiSilicon Kirin 9000E is manufactured in 5 nm and has 0.00 MB cache. The AMD EPYC 9124 is manufactured in 5 nm and has a 80.00 MB cache. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 9000E | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 9124 |
| 5 nm | Technology | 5 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Chiplet |
| Armv8-A (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| -- | ISA extensions | SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI |
| -- | Socket | SP5 |
| None | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| No | AES-NI | Yes |
| Android | Operating systems | Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 |
| Q4/2020 | Release date | Q4/2022 |
| -- | Release price | 1083 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
16C 32T @ 3.00 GHz (3.70 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz |
||
|
AMD EPYC 9124
16C 32T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9124
16C 32T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
ARM Mali-G78 MP22 @ 0.76 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9124
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9124
16C 32T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| HiSilicon Kirin 9000E | AMD EPYC 9124 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
