HiSilicon Kirin 659 vs AMD E-300

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


HiSilicon Kirin 659 CPU1 vs CPU2 AMD E-300
HiSilicon Kirin 659 AMD E-300

CPU comparison

HiSilicon Kirin 659 or AMD E-300 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The HiSilicon Kirin 659 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.36 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 659 was released in Q2/2016.

The AMD E-300 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.30 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 1 memory channels. The AMD E-300 was released in Q3/2011.
HiSilicon Kirin (29) Family AMD E (23)
HiSilicon Kirin 650 (4) CPU group AMD E/E1/E2-1000 (5)
4 Generation 1
Cortex-A53 / Cortex-A53 Architecture Zacate (Bobcat)
Mobile Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The HiSilicon Kirin 659 has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the HiSilicon Kirin 659 is 2.36 GHz while the AMD E-300 has 2 CPU cores and 2 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD E-300 is at 1.30 GHz.

HiSilicon Kirin 659 Characteristic AMD E-300
8 Cores 2
8 Threads 2
hybrid (big.LITTLE) Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
2.36 GHz
4x Cortex-A53
A-Core 1.30 GHz
1.70 GHz
4x Cortex-A53
B-Core --

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

HiSilicon Kirin 659 Characteristic AMD E-300
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

The HiSilicon Kirin 659 or AMD E-300 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.

ARM Mali-T830 MP2 GPU AMD Radeon HD 6310
0.90 GHz GPU frequency 0.49 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) --
Midgard 4 GPU Generation 3
28nm Technology 40 nm
2 Max. displays 2
2 Compute units 1
32 Shader 80
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory 1 GB
11 DirectX Version 11

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

ARM Mali-T830 MP2 GPU AMD Radeon HD 6310
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
Decode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 Decode
No Codec VP9 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC Decode
No Codec VC-1 Decode
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

The HiSilicon Kirin 659 can use up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is --. The AMD E-300 supports up to GB of memory in 1 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 8.5 GB/s.

HiSilicon Kirin 659 Characteristic AMD E-300
LPDDR3-933 Memory DDR3-1066
Max. Memory
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 1 (Single Channel)
-- Max. Bandwidth 8.5 GB/s
No ECC No
-- L2 Cache --
-- L3 Cache 1.00 MB
-- PCIe version --
-- PCIe lanes --
-- PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP for short) of the HiSilicon Kirin 659 is --, while the AMD E-300 has a TDP of 18 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently.

HiSilicon Kirin 659 Characteristic AMD E-300
-- TDP (PL1 / PBP) 18 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The HiSilicon Kirin 659 is manufactured in 16 nm and has 0.00 MB cache. The AMD E-300 is manufactured in 32 nm and has a 1.00 MB cache.

HiSilicon Kirin 659 Characteristic AMD E-300
16 nm Technology 32 nm
Chiplet Chip design Unknown
Armv8-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX
-- Socket BGA 413
None Virtualization AMD-V
No AES-NI Yes
Android Operating systems
Q2/2016 Release date Q3/2011
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the HiSilicon Kirin 659 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the AMD E-300 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
HiSilicon Kirin 659 (100%)
AMD E-300 (55%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
HiSilicon Kirin 659 (100%)
AMD E-300 (21%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
HiSilicon Kirin 659 HiSilicon Kirin 659
8C 8T @ 2.36 GHz
193 (100%)
AMD E-300 AMD E-300
2C 2T @ 1.30 GHz
106 (55%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
HiSilicon Kirin 659 HiSilicon Kirin 659
8C 8T @ 2.36 GHz
893 (100%)
AMD E-300 AMD E-300
2C 2T @ 1.30 GHz
189 (21%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
HiSilicon Kirin 659 HiSilicon Kirin 659
ARM Mali-T830 MP2 @ 0.90 GHz
61 (77%)
AMD E-300 AMD E-300
AMD Radeon HD 6310 @ 0.49 GHz
79 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
HiSilicon Kirin 659 HiSilicon Kirin 659
8C 8T @ 2.36 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD E-300 AMD E-300
2C 2T @ 1.30 GHz
627 (100%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
HiSilicon Kirin 659 HiSilicon Kirin 659
8C 8T @ 2.36 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD E-300 AMD E-300
2C 2T @ 1.30 GHz
78 (100%)

Devices using this processor

HiSilicon Kirin 659 AMD E-300
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 662HiSilicon Kirin 659 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs HiSilicon Kirin 659
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4GHiSilicon Kirin 659 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G vs HiSilicon Kirin 659
3. Intel Celeron N2840AMD E-300 Intel Celeron N2840 vs AMD E-300
4. HiSilicon Kirin 659Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 HiSilicon Kirin 659 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
5. AMD E1-6010AMD E-300 AMD E1-6010 vs AMD E-300
6. HiSilicon Kirin 710HiSilicon Kirin 659 HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs HiSilicon Kirin 659
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 765GHiSilicon Kirin 659 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs HiSilicon Kirin 659
8. HiSilicon Kirin 659Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G HiSilicon Kirin 659 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
9. AMD E-300Intel Celeron 1007U AMD E-300 vs Intel Celeron 1007U
10. AMD E-300Intel Core i5-3210M AMD E-300 vs Intel Core i5-3210M


back to index