HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs AMD Phenom II X2 B57

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


HiSilicon Kirin 658 CPU1 vs CPU2 AMD Phenom II X2 B57
HiSilicon Kirin 658 AMD Phenom II X2 B57

CPU comparison

HiSilicon Kirin 658 or AMD Phenom II X2 B57 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The HiSilicon Kirin 658 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.35 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 658 was released in Q2/2016.

The AMD Phenom II X2 B57 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD Phenom II X2 B57 was released in Q2/2010.
HiSilicon Kirin (29) Family AMD Phenom II (52)
HiSilicon Kirin 650 (4) CPU group AMD Phenom II - 545 (9)
4 Generation 2
Cortex-A53 / Cortex-A53 Architecture Callisto (K10)
Mobile Segment Desktop / Server
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The HiSilicon Kirin 658 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.35 GHz. The AMD Phenom II X2 B57 has 2 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 3.20 GHz.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 Characteristic AMD Phenom II X2 B57
8 Cores 2
8 Threads 2
hybrid (big.LITTLE) Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? Yes
2.35 GHz
4x Cortex-A53		 A-Core 3.20 GHz
1.70 GHz
4x Cortex-A53		 B-Core --

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 Characteristic AMD Phenom II X2 B57
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.
ARM Mali-T830 MP2 GPU no iGPU
0.90 GHz GPU frequency --
-- GPU (Turbo) --
Midgard 4 GPU Generation --
28nm Technology
2 Max. displays
2 Compute units --
32 Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory --
11 DirectX Version --

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
ARM Mali-T830 MP2 GPU no iGPU
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
Decode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 No
No Codec VP9 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC No
No Codec VC-1 No
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

The HiSilicon Kirin 658 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD Phenom II X2 B57 can connect up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 Characteristic AMD Phenom II X2 B57
LPDDR3-933 Memory DDR3-1333, DDR2-1066
Max. Memory
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
-- Max. Bandwidth 21.3 GB/s
No ECC No
-- L2 Cache --
-- L3 Cache 6.00 MB
-- PCIe version --
-- PCIe lanes --
-- PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The HiSilicon Kirin 658 has a TDP of --, that of the AMD Phenom II X2 B57 is 80 W.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 Characteristic AMD Phenom II X2 B57
-- TDP (PL1 / PBP) 80 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The HiSilicon Kirin 658 has a 0.00 MB cache, while the AMD Phenom II X2 B57 cache has a total of 6.00 MB.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 Characteristic AMD Phenom II X2 B57
16 nm Technology 45 nm
Chiplet Chip design Unknown
Armv8-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions SSE3, SSE4a
-- Socket AM3
None Virtualization AMD-V
No AES-NI No
Android Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q2/2016 Release date Q2/2010
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the HiSilicon Kirin 658 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the AMD Phenom II X2 B57 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 HiSilicon Kirin 658
8C 8T @ 2.35 GHz
183 (100%)
AMD Phenom II X2 B57 AMD Phenom II X2 B57
2C 2T @ 3.20 GHz
0 (0%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 HiSilicon Kirin 658
8C 8T @ 2.35 GHz
815 (100%)
AMD Phenom II X2 B57 AMD Phenom II X2 B57
2C 2T @ 3.20 GHz
0 (0%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 HiSilicon Kirin 658
ARM Mali-T830 MP2 @ 0.90 GHz
61 (100%)
AMD Phenom II X2 B57 AMD Phenom II X2 B57
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 HiSilicon Kirin 658
8C 8T @ 2.35 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD Phenom II X2 B57 AMD Phenom II X2 B57
2C 2T @ 3.20 GHz
2060 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 HiSilicon Kirin 658
8C 8T @ 2.35 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD Phenom II X2 B57 AMD Phenom II X2 B57
2C 2T @ 3.20 GHz
84 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
HiSilicon Kirin 658 HiSilicon Kirin 658
8C 8T @ 2.35 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD Phenom II X2 B57 AMD Phenom II X2 B57
2C 2T @ 3.20 GHz
162 (100%)

Devices using this processor
HiSilicon Kirin 658 AMD Phenom II X2 B57
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. AMD Phenom II X2 B57AMD G-T30L AMD Phenom II X2 B57 vs AMD G-T30L
2. AMD A6-4455MAMD Phenom II X2 B57 AMD A6-4455M vs AMD Phenom II X2 B57
3. Intel Xeon E7-8850 v2AMD Phenom II X2 B57 Intel Xeon E7-8850 v2 vs AMD Phenom II X2 B57
4. AMD Phenom II X4 840TAMD Phenom II X2 B57 AMD Phenom II X4 840T vs AMD Phenom II X2 B57
5. AMD Phenom II X2 B57AMD A10-5745M AMD Phenom II X2 B57 vs AMD A10-5745M
6. AMD FX-7600PAMD Phenom II X2 B57 AMD FX-7600P vs AMD Phenom II X2 B57
7. Intel Core i7-4790SAMD Phenom II X2 B57 Intel Core i7-4790S vs AMD Phenom II X2 B57
8. AMD Phenom II X2 B57Intel Core i3-4370 AMD Phenom II X2 B57 vs Intel Core i3-4370
9. Intel Core i3-4005UAMD Phenom II X2 B57 Intel Core i3-4005U vs AMD Phenom II X2 B57
10. AMD Phenom II X2 B57Intel Core i3-4160 AMD Phenom II X2 B57 vs Intel Core i3-4160


back to index