Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Google Tensor vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Google Tensor
98 %
8C / 8T · 2.80 GHz
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
100 %
8C / 8T · 3.13 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Google Tensor
77 %
8C / 8T · 2.80 GHz
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
100 %
8C / 8T · 3.13 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Google Tensor
83 %
ARM Mali-G78 MP20
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
100 %
ARM Mali-G78 MP24
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
Google Tensor
90 %
8C / 8T · 2.80 GHz
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
100 %
8C / 8T · 3.13 GHz
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
AnTuTu 9 Benchmark
90 entries
90 entries
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
118 entries
118 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
AI performance (NPU)
218 entries
218 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Google Tensor | HiSilicon Kirin 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Google Tensor (5) | HiSilicon Kirin (29) |
| CPU group | Google Tensor (1) | HiSilicon Kirin 9000 (2) |
| Architecture | G1 | Cortex-A77 / Cortex-A55 |
| Technology | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Segment | Smartphone / Tablet | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | ||
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor | Google Tensor G2 |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Google Tensor | HiSilicon Kirin 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 8 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) | hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 2x Cortex-X1 2.80 GHz |
1x Cortex-A77 3.13 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 2x Cortex-A76 2.25 GHz |
3x Cortex-A77 2.54 GHz |
| Core Cluster 3: | 4x Cortex-A55 1.80 GHz |
4x Cortex-A55 2.05 GHz |
| L2-Cache | 8.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | ||
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Google Tensor | HiSilicon Kirin 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | ARM Mali-G78 MP20 | ARM Mali-G78 MP24 |
| GPU frequency | 0.76 GHz | 0.76 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 20 / 320 | 24 / 384 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 1 | 1 |
| Max. GPU Memory | ||
| Technology | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Release date | Q4/2021 | Q4/2020 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Google Tensor | HiSilicon Kirin 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Google Tensor AI | |
| AI specifications | Google Edge TPU @ 1.6 TOPS | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Google Tensor | HiSilicon Kirin 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR5-5500 (53.0 GB/s) | LPDDR5-2750 LPDDR4X-2133 |
| Max. Memory | 12 GB | |
| Memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | ||
| PCIe Bandwidth |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Google Tensor | HiSilicon Kirin 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Google Tensor | HiSilicon Kirin 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Unknown | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Android | Android |
| Instruction set | Armv8-A (64 bit) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | ||
| Release date | Q4/2021 | Q4/2020 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Google Tensor is 4.3 stars (80 ratings), while HiSilicon Kirin 9000 has received 4.0 stars (33 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
2
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
5
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
6
Apple A15 Bionic (4-GPU)
6C / 6T · 0.00 GHz
7
Apple A19
6C / 6T · 4.26 GHz
8
Google Tensor
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
9
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
