Apple M2 (8-GPU) vs Intel Core Ultra 7 365H

The Apple M2 (8-GPU) was developed for users seeking a balance between mobility and computing power. Manufactured in a 5 nm process, it is based on the M2 architecture and utilizes an efficient core structure.

In benchmarks, the Apple M2 (8-GPU) achieves solid single-core performance, while the multi-core performance is optimized for standard workflows. For gaming, the Apple M2 (8 Core) graphics are only partially suitable, as they were primarily optimized for creative software. The thermal power loss is very low, which often supports fanless operation.

With a memory bandwidth of 102 GB/s and 20 MB Level 2 cache, the system operates smoothly. The price-performance ratio is stable within the context of the closed ecosystem. This processor is suitable for users who prefer a silent system with high energy efficiency. The Intel Core Ultra 7 365H is aimed at professional users in the mobile sector with the Panther Lake H architecture.

Manufacturing takes place in a 2 nm process, ensuring high transistor density. In single-core performance, the Intel Core Ultra 7 365H is at a similar level to the comparison processor but offers significantly higher multi-core performance for parallel tasks. The Intel Xe3 4 Core Graphics 32 EUs (Panther Lake) enables solid graphical representation but remains behind dedicated solutions.

Power consumption is higher, requiring an appropriate thermal solution. With 136 GB/s memory bandwidth and 18 MB Level 3 cache, it is equipped for data-intensive applications. Market prices vary depending on the end device. This processor is recommended for compute-intensive multitasking tasks and software that benefits from many cores.