Apple A14 Bionic Google Tensor G2
VS

Apple A14 Bionic vs Google Tensor G2

Last updated:
The Apple A14 Bionic, developed by Apple, was introduced with the iPhone 12 models. The Google Tensor G2, designed by Google, debuted in the Pixel 7 series.

Both are mobile system-on-chips for smartphones and tablets. Both processors are manufactured using the advanced 5nm process. The Apple A14 Bionic, with its A14 architecture, features 6 cores, consisting of two powerful Firestorm cores and four energy-efficient Icestorm cores. The Google Tensor G2, with its G2 architecture, has an 8-core configuration.

The Apple A14 Bionic demonstrates significantly higher single-core and multi-core performance, making it more advantageous for computationally intensive tasks. Its integrated Apple A14 graphics unit offers very good gaming performance, enhanced by Apple's tight hardware and software integration. The Google Tensor G2, with its ARM Mali-G710 MP7 graphics unit, achieves a higher maximum memory bandwidth of 53 GB/s compared to the Apple A14 Bionic's 34 GB/s.

This can offer advantages in specialized AI or graphics-intensive applications, although the Apple A14 Bionic is superior in many gaming scenarios. Both SoCs are designed for energy efficiency in the mobile sector. The Apple A14 Bionic is known for its high performance per watt, often delivering more power with similar or lower consumption than the Google Tensor G2.

A direct price-performance evaluation is not possible, as both are firmly integrated into end devices. The Apple A14 Bionic impresses with strong computing and graphics performance as well as excellent energy efficiency, ideal for demanding users in the Apple ecosystem. The Google Tensor G2 offers solid performance with a focus on AI and machine learning functions, making it the better choice for users of Google Pixel devices who appreciate its innovative software.

Apple A14 Bionic

  • Strong single-core and multi-core performance
  • Excellent gaming performance
  • High energy efficiency
  • Tight hardware and software integration

Google Tensor G2

  • Solid overall performance
  • Focus on AI and machine learning functions
  • Higher maximum memory bandwidth
  • Good for innovative Google software features

Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks

Single-core performance
Rank 1 - 100 %
Apple A14 Bionic
Rank 2 - 68 %
Google Tensor G2
Multi-core performance
Rank 1 - 100 %
Apple A14 Bionic
Rank 2 - 73 %
Google Tensor G2
Geekbench 6 Single-Core

Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance

Apple A14 Bionic
6C / 6T · 3.00 GHz
2,072
Google Tensor G2
8C / 8T · 2.85 GHz
1,426
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core

Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance

Apple A14 Bionic
6C / 6T · 3.00 GHz
4,689
Google Tensor G2
8C / 8T · 2.85 GHz
3,342
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core

Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance

Apple A14 Bionic
6C / 6T · 3.00 GHz
1,590
Google Tensor G2
8C / 8T · 2.85 GHz
1,068
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core

Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance

Apple A14 Bionic
6C / 6T · 3.00 GHz
4,247
Google Tensor G2
8C / 8T · 2.85 GHz
3,149
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

Apple A14 Bionic
Apple A14
749
Google Tensor G2
ARM Mali-G710 MP7
700
AnTuTu 9 Benchmark

AnTuTu 9 Benchmark
Multi-core performance

Apple A14 Bionic
6C / 6T · 3.00 GHz
729,968 pts
Google Tensor G2
8C / 8T · 2.85 GHz
789,419 pts
AI performance (NPU)

AI performance (NPU)

Apple A14 Bionic
6C / 6T · 3.00 GHz
11.0 TOPS
Google Tensor G2
8C / 8T · 2.85 GHz
4.0 TOPS

More benchmarks

At a glance

Wischen
Apple A14 BionicGoogle Tensor G2
FamilyApple A series (27)Google Tensor (5)
CPU groupApple A14 (1)Google Tensor G2 (1)
ArchitectureA14 (Firestorm/Icestorm)G2
Technology5 nm5 nm
SegmentSmartphone / TabletSmartphone / Tablet
Socket
PredecessorApple A13 BionicGoogle Tensor
SuccessorApple A15 Bionic (5-GPU)

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Wischen
Apple A14 BionicGoogle Tensor G2
CPU Cores / Threads6 / 68 / 8
Hyperthreading / SMT
Core architecturehybrid (big.LITTLE)hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE)
Core Cluster 1: 2x Firestorm
3.00 GHz
2x Cortex-X1
2.85 GHz
Core Cluster 2: 4x Icestorm
1.82 GHz
2x Cortex-A78
2.35 GHz
Core Cluster 3: 4x Cortex-A55
1.80 GHz
L2-Cache12.00 MB8.00 MB
L3-Cache16.00 MB4.00 MB
Overclocking

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

Wischen
Apple A14 BionicGoogle Tensor G2
GPU nameApple A14ARM Mali-G710 MP7
GPU frequency1.46 GHz0.90 GHz
CUs / Shader16 / 2567 /
Raytracing
Max. displays31
Max. GPU Memory6 GB
Technology5 nm4 nm
Release dateQ3/2020Q2/2021

NPU AI performance

Wischen
Apple A14 BionicGoogle Tensor G2
AI hardwareApple Neural EngineGoogle Tensor AI
AI specifications16 Neural cores @ 11 TOPSGoogle Edge TPU @ 4 TOPS
NPU + CPU + iGPU

Memory & PCIe

Wischen
Apple A14 BionicGoogle Tensor G2
MemoryLPDDR4X-4266 (34.1 GB/s)
LPDDR5-5500 (53.0 GB/s)
Max. Memory6 GB12 GB
Memory channels12
ECCNoNo
PCIe
PCIe Bandwidth

Thermal Management

Wischen
Apple A14 BionicGoogle Tensor G2
TDP7.25 W10 W
TDP (PL2)
TDP up
TDP down
T. junction max.

Technical details

Wischen
Apple A14 BionicGoogle Tensor G2
Chip designChipletChiplet
AES-NI
Operating systemsiOSAndroid
Instruction setArmv8-A (64 bit)Armv8-A (64 bit)
ISA extensions
Release dateQ3/2020Q4/2022
Release price
Documents

Your rating

Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Apple A14 Bionic is 3.9 stars (241 ratings), while Google Tensor G2 has received 4.0 stars (86 ratings).

Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.

Apple A14 Bionic
Apple A14 Bionic
6C / 6T · 3.00 GHz
Google Tensor G2
Google Tensor G2
8C / 8T · 2.85 GHz

Most popular CPUs in both categories

Apple A14 Bionic
Apple A14 Bionic
Buy now on Amazon and save! Buy on Amazon