Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs Intel Pentium E2140
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
64C / 128T · 4.20 GHz
Intel Pentium E2140
18 %
2C / 2T · 1.60 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
64C / 128T · 3.00 GHz
2C / 2T · 1.60 GHz
More benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
Blender 3.1 Benchmark
213 entries
213 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
V-Ray CPU-Render
251 entries
251 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Intel Pentium E2140 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO (20) | Intel Pentium (150) |
| CPU group | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3000 (4) | Intel Pentium D (6) |
| Architecture | Castle Peak (Zen 2) | Presler |
| Technology | 7 nm | 65 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Socket | WRX8 (sWRX8) | LGA 775 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Intel Pentium E2140 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 64 / 128 | 2 / 2 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✓ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 64x | 2x Core |
| Frequency: | 2.70 GHz | 1.60 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 4.20 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 3.00 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | 32.00 MB | 1.00 MB |
| L3-Cache | 256.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✓ | ✓ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Intel Pentium E2140 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | no iGPU | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | ||
| CUs / Shader | / | / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | ||
| Max. GPU Memory | ||
| Technology | ||
| Release date |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Intel Pentium E2140 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Intel Pentium E2140 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR4-3200 (51.2 GB/s) | DDR3-1066 (17.1 GB/s) DDR2-800 (12.8 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 2048 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory channels | 8 | 2 |
| ECC | Yes | No |
| PCIe | 4.0 x 128 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 252.0 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Intel Pentium E2140 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 280 W | 65 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 95 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Intel Pentium E2140 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Chiplet | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | Windows 10, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 | |
| Release date | Q1/2021 | Q2/2007 |
| Release price | 5489 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is 3.8 stars (6 ratings), while Intel Pentium E2140 has received 0 stars (0 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
3
Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
24C / 24T · 5.50 GHz
4
Intel Celeron 450
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
5
Intel Core i5-13600KF
14C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
6
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
8C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
7
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C / 28T · 3.30 GHz
8
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
64C / 128T · 4.20 GHz
9
Intel Pentium E2140
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
