Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT vs Intel Celeron E1600
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
100 %
12C / 24T · 4.70 GHz
Intel Celeron E1600
20 %
2C / 2T · 2.40 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
100 %
12C / 24T · 4.60 GHz
2C / 2T · 2.40 GHz
More benchmarks
Cinebench 2024 (SC)
427 entries
427 entries
Cinebench 2024 (MC)
422 entries
422 entries
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Monero Hashrate
94 entries
94 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | Intel Celeron E1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD Ryzen 9 (43) | Intel Celeron (165) |
| CPU group | AMD Ryzen 3000 (15) | Intel Celeron E1000 (4) |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) | Conroe (Core) |
| Technology | 7 nm | 65 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Socket | AM4 (PGA 1331) | LGA 775 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor | AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | Intel Celeron E1600 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 2 / 2 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✓ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 12x | 2x Core |
| Frequency: | 4.10 GHz | 2.40 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 4.70 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 4.60 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | 0.50 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 64.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✓ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | Intel Celeron E1600 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | no iGPU | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | ||
| CUs / Shader | / | / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | ||
| Max. GPU Memory | ||
| Technology | ||
| Release date |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | Intel Celeron E1600 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | Intel Celeron E1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR4-3200 (51.2 GB/s) | DDR3-1066 (17.1 GB/s) DDR2-800 (12.8 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | Yes | No |
| PCIe | 4.0 x 20 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 39.4 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | Intel Celeron E1600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 105 W | 65 W |
| TDP (PL2) | 142 W | |
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 95 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | Intel Celeron E1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Chiplet | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | Windows 10, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 |
| Release date | Q2/2020 | Q2/2009 |
| Release price | 58 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT is 4.7 stars (17 ratings), while Intel Celeron E1600 has received 0 stars (0 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
3
Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
24C / 24T · 5.50 GHz
4
Intel Celeron 450
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
5
Intel Core i5-13600KF
14C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
6
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
12C / 24T · 4.70 GHz
7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
8C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
8
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C / 28T · 3.30 GHz
9
Intel Celeron E1600
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
