AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Samsung Exynos 2200

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD Ryzen 7 2700X CPU1 vs CPU2 Samsung Exynos 2200
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Samsung Exynos 2200

CPU comparison

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X or Samsung Exynos 2200 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X has 8 cores with 16 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.30 GHz. Up to 64 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X was released in Q2/2018.

The Samsung Exynos 2200 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.80 GHz. The CPU supports up to 12 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 2200 was released in Q1/2022.
AMD Ryzen 7 (70) Family Samsung Exynos (47)
AMD Ryzen 2000 (9) CPU group Samsung Exynos 2200 (1)
2 Generation 6
Pinnacle Ridge (Zen+) Architecture Cortex-X2/-A710/-A510
Desktop / Server Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor Samsung Exynos 2100
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 16 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X is 3.70 GHz (4.30 GHz) while the Samsung Exynos 2200 has 8 CPU cores and 8 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Samsung Exynos 2200 is at 2.80 GHz.

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Characteristic Samsung Exynos 2200
8 Cores 8
16 Threads 8
normal Core architecture hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE)
Yes Hyperthreading No
Yes Overclocking ? No
3.70 GHz (4.30 GHz) A-Core 2.80 GHz
1x Cortex-X2
-- B-Core 2.52 GHz
3x Cortex-A710
-- C-Core 1.82 GHz
4x Cortex-A510

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Characteristic Samsung Exynos 2200
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X or Samsung Exynos 2200 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.

no iGPU GPU Samsung Xclipse 920
GPU frequency 1.30 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) 1.30 GHz
-- GPU Generation 1
Technology 4 nm
Max. displays 0
-- Compute units 24
-- Shader 384
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory 4 GB
-- DirectX Version 12

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

no iGPU GPU Samsung Xclipse 920
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 Decode
No Codec AVC No
No Codec VC-1 No
No Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X can use up to 64 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 46.9 GB/s. The Samsung Exynos 2200 supports up to 12 GB of memory in 4 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 51.2 GB/s.

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Characteristic Samsung Exynos 2200
DDR4-2933 Memory LPDDR5-6400
64 GB Max. Memory 12 GB
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 4 (Quad Channel)
46.9 GB/s Max. Bandwidth 51.2 GB/s
Yes ECC No
-- L2 Cache --
16.00 MB L3 Cache --
3.0 PCIe version --
20 PCIe lanes --
19.7 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X is 105 W, while the Samsung Exynos 2200 has a TDP of --. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently.

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Characteristic Samsung Exynos 2200
105 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
95 °C Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X is manufactured in 12 nm and has 16.00 MB cache. The Samsung Exynos 2200 is manufactured in 4 nm and has a 0.00 MB cache.

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Characteristic Samsung Exynos 2200
12 nm Technology 4 nm
Chiplet Chip design Unknown
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv9-A (64 bit)
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 ISA extensions --
AM4 (PGA 1331) Socket --
AMD-V, SVM Virtualization None
Yes AES-NI No
Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux Operating systems Android
Q2/2018 Release date Q1/2022
320 $ Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 3.6 stars (15 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Samsung Exynos 2200 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 3.6 stars (25 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X (91%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 (100%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 (52%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8C 16T @ 4.30 GHz
1062 (90%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
1182 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8C 16T @ 3.85 GHz
7100 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
3586 (51%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8C 16T @ 4.30 GHz
1294 (91%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
1428 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8C 16T @ 3.85 GHz
6789 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
3528 (52%)

Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)

The Cinebench 2024 benchmark is based on the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxon's 3D program Cinema 4D. The benchmark runs are each 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8C 16T @ 4.30 GHz
66 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)

The Multi-Core test of the Cinebench 2024 benchmark uses all cpu cores to render using the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxons Cinema 4D. The benchmark run is 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8C 16T @ 4.30 GHz
589 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8C 16T @ 4.30 GHz
1071 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8C 16T @ 3.85 GHz
9971 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8C 16T @ 4.30 GHz
411 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8C 16T @ 3.85 GHz
3951 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 1.30 GHz
1422 (100%)

AnTuTu 10 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 10 benchmark is one of the best-known benchmarks for mobile processors, which is now available in version 10. There is a version for Android-based smartphones and tablets, as well as a version for Apple mobile devices, i.e. iPhones and iPads.

The Antutu 10 benchmark has 3 phases. In the first phase, the device's RAM is tested, in phase 2 the graphics are tested and in the final phase the entire device is pushed to its performance limits by rendering 3D graphics.

Antutu 10 is therefore ideal for comparing the performance of different devices.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8C 16T @ 3.70 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
1128320 (100%)

AnTuTu 9 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8C 16T @ 3.70 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
917364 (100%)

Blender 3.1 Benchmark

In the Blender Benchmark 3.1, the scenes "monster", "junkshop" and "classroom" are rendered and the time required by the system is measured. In our benchmark we test the CPU and not the graphics card. Blender 3.1 was presented as a standalone version in March 2022.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8C 16T @ 3.85 GHz
156 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8C 16T @ 3.85 GHz
17588 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8C 16T @ 3.85 GHz
211.2 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Single-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8C 16T @ 3.85 GHz
457 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8C 16T @ 3.70 GHz
4799 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8C 16T @ 4.30 GHz
177 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
8C 16T @ 3.85 GHz
1817 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Samsung Exynos 2200
Captiva Workstation PC Ryzen 7 2700X
Acer Nitro N50-100 Ryzen 7 2700X
HP EliteDesk 705 G4 Workstation Edition MT Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X (6TL46EA#ABD)
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Galaxy S22 Plus
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra

News and articles for the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and the Samsung Exynos 2200


Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600
2. AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 7 3700X AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
3. AMD Ryzen 5 5600XAMD Ryzen 7 2700X AMD Ryzen 5 5600X vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
4. AMD Ryzen 7 5800XAMD Ryzen 7 2700X AMD Ryzen 7 5800X vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
5. AMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 2700X AMD Ryzen 5 3600X vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
6. AMD Ryzen 7 2700XIntel Core i7-8700K AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i7-8700K
7. AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 7 2700 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700
8. AMD Ryzen 9 5900XAMD Ryzen 7 2700X AMD Ryzen 9 5900X vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
9. AMD Ryzen 7 2700XIntel Core i7-9700K AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i7-9700K
10. AMD Ryzen 7 5700XAMD Ryzen 7 2700X AMD Ryzen 7 5700X vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700X


back to index