AMD Phenom II X3 710 vs AMD EPYC 7662

Last updated: 2024-04-12

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD Phenom II X3 710		AMD EPYC 7662
CPU comparison AMD Phenom II X3 710 or AMD EPYC 7662 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results. The AMD Phenom II X3 710 has 3 cores with 3 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.60 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The AMD Phenom II X3 710 was released in Q1/2009. The AMD EPYC 7662 has 64 cores with 128 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.30 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7662 was released in Q1/2020.

AMD Phenom II (52)	Family	AMD EPYC (129)
AMD Phenom II - 700 (9)	CPU group	AMD EPYC 7002 (24)
3	Generation	2
Heka (K10)	Architecture	Rome (Zen 2)
Desktop / Server	Segment	Desktop / Server
--	Predecessor	--
--	Successor	AMD EPYC 7763

CPU Cores and Base Frequency The AMD Phenom II X3 710 has 3 CPU cores and can calculate 3 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD Phenom II X3 710 is 2.60 GHz while the AMD EPYC 7662 has 64 CPU cores and 128 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 7662 is at 2.00 GHz (3.30 GHz).
AMD Phenom II X3 710	Characteristic	AMD EPYC 7662
3	Cores	64
3	Threads	128
normal	Core architecture	normal
No	Hyperthreading	Yes
Yes	Overclocking ?	No
2.60 GHz	Frequency	2.00 GHz
--	Turbo Frequency (1 Core)	3.30 GHz
--	Turbo Frequency (All Cores)	2.40 GHz

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.
AMD Phenom II X3 710	Characteristic	AMD EPYC 7662
--	AI hardware	--
--	AI specifications	--

Internal Graphics The AMD Phenom II X3 710 or AMD EPYC 7662 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.
no iGPU	GPU	no iGPU
	GPU frequency	--
--	GPU (Turbo)	--
--	GPU Generation	--
	Technology
	Max. displays
--	Compute units	--
--	Shader	--
No	Hardware Raytracing	No
No	Frame Generation	No
--	Max. GPU Memory	--
--	DirectX Version	--

Hardware codec support A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
no iGPU	GPU	no iGPU
No	Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit)	No
No	Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit)	No
No	Codec h264	No
No	Codec VP9	No
No	Codec VP8	No
No	Codec AV1	No
No	Codec AVC	No
No	Codec VC-1	No
No	Codec JPEG	No

Memory & PCIe The AMD Phenom II X3 710 can use up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 21.3 GB/s. The AMD EPYC 7662 supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 51.2 GB/s.
AMD Phenom II X3 710	Characteristic	AMD EPYC 7662
DDR3-1333, DDR2-1066	Memory	DDR4-3200
	Max. Memory
2 (Dual Channel)	Memory channels	8 (Octa Channel)
21.3 GB/s	Max. Bandwidth	51.2 GB/s
No	ECC	Yes
--	L2 Cache	--
6.00 MB	L3 Cache	256.00 MB
--	PCIe version	4.0
--	PCIe lanes	128
--	PCIe Bandwidth	252.0 GB/s
Thermal Management The thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD Phenom II X3 710 is 95 W, while the AMD EPYC 7662 has a TDP of 225 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently.
AMD Phenom II X3 710	Characteristic	AMD EPYC 7662
95 W	TDP (PL1 / PBP)	225 W
--	TDP (PL2)	--
--	TDP up	--
--	TDP down	--
--	Tjunction max.	--
Technical details The AMD Phenom II X3 710 is manufactured in 45 nm and has 6.00 MB cache. The AMD EPYC 7662 is manufactured in 7 nm and has a 256.00 MB cache.
AMD Phenom II X3 710	Characteristic	AMD EPYC 7662
45 nm	Technology	7 nm
Unknown	Chip design	Chiplet
x86-64 (64 bit)	Instruction set (ISA)	x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE3, SSE4a	ISA extensions	SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
AM3	Socket	SP3
AMD-V	Virtualization	AMD-V, SVM
No	AES-NI	Yes
Windows 10, Linux	Operating systems	Windows 10, Linux
Q1/2009	Release date	Q1/2020
--	Release price	--

show more data		show more data

AMD Phenom II X3 710 3C 3T @ 2.60 GHz buy now on Amazon and save! AMD EPYC 7662 64C 128T @ 2.00 GHz (3.30 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!

Rate these processors

Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks

AMD Phenom II X3 710 (34%)

AMD EPYC 7662 (100%)

⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks

AMD Phenom II X3 710 (4%)

AMD EPYC 7662 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	AMD Phenom II X3 710 3C 3T @ 2.60 GHz	356 (34%)
	AMD EPYC 7662 64C 128T @ 3.30 GHz	1046 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	AMD Phenom II X3 710 3C 3T @ 2.60 GHz	979 (3%)
	AMD EPYC 7662 64C 128T @ 2.40 GHz	33944 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.


	AMD Phenom II X3 710 3C 3T @ 2.60 GHz	2610 (4%)
	AMD EPYC 7662 64C 128T @ 2.40 GHz	73144 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	AMD Phenom II X3 710 3C 3T @ 2.60 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD EPYC 7662 64C 128T @ 3.30 GHz	386 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	AMD Phenom II X3 710 3C 3T @ 2.60 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD EPYC 7662 64C 128T @ 2.40 GHz	18203 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	AMD Phenom II X3 710 3C 3T @ 2.60 GHz	68 (100%)
	AMD EPYC 7662 64C 128T @ 3.30 GHz	0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	AMD Phenom II X3 710 3C 3T @ 2.60 GHz	198 (100%)
	AMD EPYC 7662 64C 128T @ 2.40 GHz	0 (0%)

Devices using this processor
AMD Phenom II X3 710	AMD EPYC 7662
Unknown	Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs


1.		AMD Phenom II X2 555 vs AMD Phenom II X3 710
2.		AMD Phenom II X2 550 vs AMD Phenom II X3 710
3.		Intel Core i3-4158U vs AMD Phenom II X3 710
4.		AMD Phenom II X3 710 vs AMD FX-4150
5.		AMD Phenom II X3 710 vs Intel Celeron N3050
6.		AMD Phenom II X3 710 vs AMD A8-5500
7.		AMD EPYC 7742 vs AMD EPYC 7662
8.		AMD A10-6800K vs AMD Phenom II X3 710
9.		Intel Core i7-5550U vs AMD Phenom II X3 710
10.		Intel Core i7-4600U vs AMD Phenom II X3 710