Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
AMD FX-8350 vs AMD A10-7800
Last updated:
Summary
The AMD FX-8350 is a desktop processor based on the 32nm Vishera (Bulldozer) architecture.
It is aimed at users who use a dedicated graphics card and require high computing power for multi-threaded applications. It features eight CPU cores and 8 MB of Level 3 Cache. The Level 2 Cache is 0 MB. The AMD A10-7800 is a desktop APU based on the 28nm Kaveri (Steamroller) architecture.
This APU is designed for mainstream systems that require an integrated graphics solution for everyday tasks and light gaming. It integrates four CPU cores and an AMD Radeon R7 graphics unit with 4 MB of Level 3 Cache and 0 MB of Level 2 Cache. A maximum memory bandwidth of 30 GB/s and PCIe 3.0 are supported.
In terms of computing performance, the AMD A10-7800 offers significantly higher single-core performance. For multi-threaded applications, the AMD FX-8350 delivers considerably stronger multi-core performance. In gaming, the AMD FX-8350 combined with a separate graphics card is superior.
The AMD A10-7800 enables basic gaming and display output with its integrated graphics unit, but is limited to less demanding titles. Information on Thermal Design Power (TDP) and prices is not available. In summary, the AMD FX-8350 is suitable for demanding multi-core tasks with dedicated graphics.
The AMD A10-7800 is a good choice for budget systems that need an integrated graphics solution and good single-core performance for everyday use.
It is aimed at users who use a dedicated graphics card and require high computing power for multi-threaded applications. It features eight CPU cores and 8 MB of Level 3 Cache. The Level 2 Cache is 0 MB. The AMD A10-7800 is a desktop APU based on the 28nm Kaveri (Steamroller) architecture.
This APU is designed for mainstream systems that require an integrated graphics solution for everyday tasks and light gaming. It integrates four CPU cores and an AMD Radeon R7 graphics unit with 4 MB of Level 3 Cache and 0 MB of Level 2 Cache. A maximum memory bandwidth of 30 GB/s and PCIe 3.0 are supported.
In terms of computing performance, the AMD A10-7800 offers significantly higher single-core performance. For multi-threaded applications, the AMD FX-8350 delivers considerably stronger multi-core performance. In gaming, the AMD FX-8350 combined with a separate graphics card is superior.
The AMD A10-7800 enables basic gaming and display output with its integrated graphics unit, but is limited to less demanding titles. Information on Thermal Design Power (TDP) and prices is not available. In summary, the AMD FX-8350 is suitable for demanding multi-core tasks with dedicated graphics.
The AMD A10-7800 is a good choice for budget systems that need an integrated graphics solution and good single-core performance for everyday use.
AMD FX-8350
- Eight CPU cores for multi-core performance
- Vishera (Bulldozer) architecture (32 nm)
- Requires a dedicated graphics card
- 8 MB Level 3 Cache
AMD A10-7800
- Integrated AMD Radeon R7 graphics unit
- Four CPU cores with higher single-core performance
- Kaveri (Steamroller) architecture (28 nm)
- Supports PCIe 3.0
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Cinebench R20 Single-Core
Single-core performance
AMD FX-8350
100 %
8C / 8T · 4.20 GHz
AMD A10-7800
99 %
4C / 4T · 3.90 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
AMD FX-8350
100 %
8C / 8T · 4.20 GHz
AMD A10-7800
85 %
4C / 4T · 3.90 GHz
Cinebench R20 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
AMD FX-8350
100 %
8C / 8T · 4.10 GHz
AMD A10-7800
51 %
4C / 4T · 3.70 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
AMD FX-8350
100 %
8C / 8T · 4.10 GHz
AMD A10-7800
51 %
4C / 4T · 3.70 GHz
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Single-core performance
AMD FX-8350
100 %
8C / 8T · 4.20 GHz
AMD A10-7800
64 %
4C / 4T · 3.90 GHz
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Multi-core performance
AMD FX-8350
100 %
8C / 8T · 4.10 GHz
AMD A10-7800
36 %
4C / 4T · 3.70 GHz
More benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
Blender 3.1 Benchmark
213 entries
213 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
190 entries
190 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (SC)
250 entries
250 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-8350 | AMD A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD FX (30) | AMD A (112) |
| CPU group | AMD FX-8000 (11) | AMD A10-7000 (7) |
| Architecture | Vishera (Bulldozer) | Kaveri (Steamroller) |
| Technology | 32 nm | 28 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Notebook |
| Socket | AM3+ | FM2+ |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-8350 | AMD A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 8x | 4x |
| Frequency: | 4.00 GHz | 3.50 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 4.20 GHz | 3.90 GHz |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 4.10 GHz | 3.70 GHz |
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 8.00 MB | 4.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✓ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-8350 | AMD A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | no iGPU | AMD Radeon R7 - 512 (Kaveri) |
| GPU frequency | 0.72 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | / | 8 / 512 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | |
| Technology | 28 nm | |
| Release date | Q1/2014 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-8350 | AMD A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-8350 | AMD A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1866 (29.9 GB/s) | DDR3-1866 (29.9 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | ||
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 16 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 15.8 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-8350 | AMD A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125 W | 65 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-8350 | AMD A10-7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Unknown | Unknown |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 |
| Release date | Q4/2012 | Q1/2014 |
| Release price | 170 $ | |
| Documents |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of AMD FX-8350 is 4.3 stars (104 ratings), while AMD A10-7800 has received 4.1 stars (21 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
5
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
6
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
7
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
8
AMD FX-8350
8C / 8T · 4.20 GHz
9
AMD A10-7800
4C / 4T · 3.90 GHz
Popular Comparisons
