Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
AMD FX-8300 vs Apple A17 Pro
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
AMD FX-8300
24 %
8C / 8T · 4.20 GHz
Apple A17 Pro
100 %
6C / 6T · 3.78 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
AMD FX-8300
39 %
8C / 8T · 4.00 GHz
Apple A17 Pro
100 %
6C / 6T · 3.78 GHz
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
AnTuTu 10 Benchmark
25 entries
25 entries
AnTuTu 9 Benchmark
90 entries
90 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (SC)
250 entries
250 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
AI performance (NPU)
218 entries
218 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-8300 | Apple A17 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD FX (30) | Apple A series (27) |
| CPU group | AMD FX-8000 (11) | Apple A17 Pro (1) |
| Architecture | Vishera (Bulldozer) | Ibiza |
| Technology | 32 nm | 3 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | AM3+ | |
| Predecessor | Apple A16 Bionic | |
| Successor | Apple A18 Pro |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-8300 | Apple A17 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 6 / 6 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 8x 3.30 - 4.20 GHz |
2x Ibiza P-Core 0.70 - 3.78 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 4x Ibiza E-Core 0.74 - 2.11 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 20.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 8.00 MB | 24.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✓ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-8300 | Apple A17 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | no iGPU | Apple A17 Pro (6 GPU Cores) |
| GPU frequency | 0.39 - 1.40 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | / | 24 / 768 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✓ |
| Max. displays | 1 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 6 GB | |
| Technology | 3 nm | |
| Release date | Q3/2023 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-8300 | Apple A17 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Apple Neural Engine | |
| AI specifications | 16 Neural cores @ 35 TOPS | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-8300 | Apple A17 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1866 (29.9 GB/s) | LPDDR5-6400 (51.2 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 8 GB | |
| Memory channels | 2 | 1 |
| ECC | Yes | No |
| PCIe | ||
| PCIe Bandwidth |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-8300 | Apple A17 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 95 W | 11 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-8300 | Apple A17 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Unknown | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | iOS |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | Armv8.6-A (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 | |
| Release date | Q2/2013 | Q3/2023 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of AMD FX-8300 is 4.1 stars (27 ratings), while Apple A17 Pro has received 4.1 stars (459 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
3
Intel Celeron 450
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
4
Intel Core i5-13600KF
14C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
8C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
6
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C / 28T · 3.30 GHz
7
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
8C / 16T · 4.60 GHz
8
AMD FX-8300
8C / 8T · 4.20 GHz
9
Apple A17 Pro
6C / 6T · 3.78 GHz
Popular Comparisons
