Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
AMD EPYC 9754S vs Intel Core Ultra 7 366H
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
AMD EPYC 9754S | Intel Core Ultra 7 366H |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD EPYC (147) | Intel Core Ultra 7 (31) |
| CPU group | AMD EPYC 8004/9004 (15) | Intel Core Ultra 300H (8) |
| Architecture | Bergamo/Siena (Zen 4c) | Panther Lake H |
| Technology | 5 nm | 2 nm |
| Segment | Server | Notebook |
| Socket | SP5 | BGA 2540 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
AMD EPYC 9754S | Intel Core Ultra 7 366H |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 128 / 128 | 16 / 16 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 128x Zen 4c 2.25 - 3.10 GHz |
4x Cougar Cove 2.00 - 4.80 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 8x Darkmont 1.60 - 3.60 GHz |
|
| Core Cluster 3: | 4x Darkmont LP 1.60 - 3.40 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 16.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 256.00 MB | 18.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
AMD EPYC 9754S | Intel Core Ultra 7 366H |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | no iGPU | Intel Xe3 4 Core Graphics 32 EUs (Panther Lake) |
| GPU frequency | 0.00 - 2.50 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | / | 32 / 512 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✓ |
| Max. displays | 4 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 128 GB | |
| Technology | 3 nm | |
| Release date | Q1/2026 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
AMD EPYC 9754S | Intel Core Ultra 7 366H |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Intel® AI Boost | |
| AI specifications | Intel AI Boost NPU 5 @ 50 TOPS | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
AMD EPYC 9754S | Intel Core Ultra 7 366H |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR5-4800 (460.8 GB/s) | LPDDR5X-8533 (135.5 GB/s) DDR5-7200 (115.2 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 6144 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory channels | 12 | 2 |
| ECC | Yes | No |
| PCIe | 5.0 x 128 | 5.0 x 20 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 504.1 GB/s | 78.8 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
AMD EPYC 9754S | Intel Core Ultra 7 366H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 360 W | 25 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | 400 W | 80 W |
| TDP down | 320 W | 15 W |
| T. junction max. | 100 °C | 100 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
AMD EPYC 9754S | Intel Core Ultra 7 366H |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Chiplet | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 | Windows 11, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 |
| Release date | Q2/2023 | Q1/2026 |
| Release price | 10200 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of AMD EPYC 9754S is 4.2 stars (5 ratings), while Intel Core Ultra 7 366H has received 4.0 stars (1 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
3
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
4
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
7
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
8
AMD EPYC 9754S
128C / 128T · 3.10 GHz
9
Intel Core Ultra 7 366H
16C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
Popular Comparisons
