AMD EPYC 9454P vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD EPYC 9454P | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 | |
CPU comparisonAMD EPYC 9454P or Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD EPYC 9454P has 48 cores with 96 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.80 GHz. Up to 6144 GB of memory is supported in 12 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 9454P was released in Q4/2022. The Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz. The CPU supports up to 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 was released in Q1/2010. |
||
| AMD EPYC (129) | Family | Intel Core2 Quad (19) |
| AMD EPYC 9004 (21) | CPU group | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8000/Q9000 (16) |
| 4 | Generation | 2 |
| Genoa / Genoa-X (Zen 4) | Architecture | Yorkfield (Penryn) |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD EPYC 9454P has 48 CPU cores and can calculate 96 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 9454P is 2.75 GHz (3.80 GHz) while the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 has 4 CPU cores and 4 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 is at 3.20 GHz. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9454P | Characteristic | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 |
| 48 | Cores | 4 |
| 96 | Threads | 4 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.75 GHz | Frequency | 3.20 GHz |
| 3.80 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| 3.65 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD EPYC 9454P can use up to 6144 GB of memory in 12 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 460.8 GB/s. The Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 supports up to 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 17.1 GB/s. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9454P | Characteristic | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 |
| DDR5-4800 | Memory | DDR3-1066, DDR2-800 |
| 6144 GB | Max. Memory | 16 GB |
| 12 | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 460.8 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 17.1 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| 48.00 MB | L2 Cache | 6.00 MB |
| 256.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 5.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 128 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 504.1 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD EPYC 9454P is 290 W, while the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 has a TDP of 95 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9454P | Characteristic | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 |
| 290 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 95 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| 300 W | TDP up | -- |
| 240 W | TDP down | -- |
| 100 °C | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD EPYC 9454P is manufactured in 5 nm and has 304.00 MB cache. The Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 is manufactured in 45 nm and has a 6.00 MB cache. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9454P | Characteristic | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 |
| 5 nm | Technology | 45 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Monolithic |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI | ISA extensions | MMX, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1 |
| SP5 | Socket | LGA 775 |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q4/2022 | Release date | Q1/2010 |
| 4598 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
48C 96T @ 2.75 GHz (3.80 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
4C 4T @ 3.20 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD EPYC 9454P
48C 96T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700
4C 4T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9454P
48C 96T @ 3.65 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700
4C 4T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9454P
48C 96T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700
4C 4T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9454P
48C 96T @ 3.65 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700
4C 4T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9454P
48C 96T @ 3.65 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700
4C 4T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD EPYC 9454P | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
