Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
AMD EPYC 9384X vs MediaTek MT8169A
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
AMD EPYC 9384X | MediaTek MT8169A |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD EPYC (147) | Mediatek MT-Serie (72) |
| CPU group | AMD EPYC 9004 (21) | MediaTek MT816xA 12nm (1) |
| Architecture | Genoa / Genoa-X (Zen 4) | Cortex-A55 |
| Technology | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Segment | Server | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | SP5 | |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
AMD EPYC 9384X | MediaTek MT8169A |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 6 / 6 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✓ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 32x Zen 4 | 6x Cortex-A55 |
| Frequency: | 3.10 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 3.90 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 3.50 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 768.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
AMD EPYC 9384X | MediaTek MT8169A |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | no iGPU | ARM Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU frequency | 0.61 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | / | 2 / 32 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | ||
| Technology | 16 nm | |
| Release date | Q3/2020 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
AMD EPYC 9384X | MediaTek MT8169A |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
AMD EPYC 9384X | MediaTek MT8169A |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR5-4800 (460.8 GB/s) | LPDDR4-1866 (14.9 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 6144 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory channels | 12 | 2 |
| ECC | Yes | No |
| PCIe | 5.0 x 128 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 504.1 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
AMD EPYC 9384X | MediaTek MT8169A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 320 W | 4 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | 400 W | |
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 100 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
AMD EPYC 9384X | MediaTek MT8169A |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Chiplet | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 | Android |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI | |
| Release date | Q2/2023 | Q4/2022 |
| Release price | 5529 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of AMD EPYC 9384X is 0 stars (0 ratings), while MediaTek MT8169A has received 3.0 stars (2 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
2
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
5
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
6
Apple A15 Bionic (4-GPU)
6C / 6T · 0.00 GHz
7
Apple A19
6C / 6T · 4.26 GHz
8
MediaTek MT8169A
6C / 6T · 0.00 GHz
9
AMD EPYC 9384X
32C / 64T · 3.90 GHz
Popular Comparisons
