AMD EPYC 9374F vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD EPYC 9374F | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G | |
CPU comparisonAMD EPYC 9374F or Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD EPYC 9374F has 32 cores with 64 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.30 GHz. Up to 6144 GB of memory is supported in 12 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 9374F was released in Q4/2022. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.20 GHz. The CPU supports up to 6 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G was released in Q1/2022. |
||
| AMD EPYC (129) | Family | Qualcomm Snapdragon (103) |
| AMD EPYC 9004 (21) | CPU group | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (1) |
| 4 | Generation | 9 |
| Genoa / Genoa-X (Zen 4) | Architecture | Kryo 660 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD EPYC 9374F is a 32 core processor with a clock frequency of 3.85 GHz (4.30 GHz). The Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.20 GHz. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9374F | Characteristic | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G |
| 32 | Cores | 8 |
| 64 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 3.85 GHz (4.30 GHz) 32x Zen 4 |
A-Core | 2.20 GHz 2x Kryo 660 Gold |
| -- | B-Core | 1.70 GHz 6x Kryo 660 Silver |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | Qualcomm Adreno 619 (6nm) |
| GPU frequency | 0.95 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| -- | GPU Generation | -- |
| Technology | 6 nm | |
| Max. displays | 0 | |
| -- | Compute units | -- |
| -- | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| -- | DirectX Version | 12.1 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | Qualcomm Adreno 619 (6nm) |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | Decode |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | Decode |
| No | Codec VC-1 | Decode |
| No | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD EPYC 9374F supports a maximum of 6144 GB of memory in 12 memory channels. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G can connect up to 6 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9374F | Characteristic | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G |
| DDR5-4800 | Memory | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| 6144 GB | Max. Memory | 6 GB |
| 12 | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 460.8 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 17.0 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| 32.00 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
| 256.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 5.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 128 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 504.1 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The AMD EPYC 9374F has a TDP of 320 W, that of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G is --. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9374F | Characteristic | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G |
| 320 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| 400 W | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| 100 °C | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD EPYC 9374F has a 288.00 MB cache, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G cache has a total of 0.00 MB. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9374F | Characteristic | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G |
| 5 nm | Technology | 6 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI | ISA extensions | -- |
| SP5 | Socket | -- |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 | Operating systems | Android |
| Q4/2022 | Release date | Q1/2022 |
| 4850 $ | Release price | 250 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
32C 64T @ 3.85 GHz (4.30 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 0 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
AMD EPYC 9374F
32C 64T @ 4.10 GHz |
||
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9374F
32C 64T @ 4.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9374F
32C 64T @ 4.10 GHz |
||
|
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9374F
32C 64T @ 4.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9374F
32C 64T @ 4.10 GHz |
||
|
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 9 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9374F
32C 64T @ 3.85 GHz |
||
|
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD EPYC 9374F | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G |
| Unknown | Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
