AMD EPYC 9224 vs Intel Celeron 5305U

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD EPYC 9224 CPU1 vs CPU2 Intel Celeron 5305U
AMD EPYC 9224 Intel Celeron 5305U

CPU comparison

AMD EPYC 9224 or Intel Celeron 5305U - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The AMD EPYC 9224 has 24 cores with 48 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.70 GHz. Up to 6144 GB of memory is supported in 12 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 9224 was released in Q4/2022.

The Intel Celeron 5305U has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.30 GHz. The CPU supports up to 64 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Celeron 5305U was released in Q2/2020.
AMD EPYC (129) Family Intel Celeron (165)
AMD EPYC 9004 (21) CPU group Intel Celeron 5000 (2)
4 Generation 10
Genoa / Genoa-X (Zen 4) Architecture Comet Lake U
Desktop / Server Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor Intel Celeron 4305U
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD EPYC 9224 is a 24 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.50 GHz (3.70 GHz). The Intel Celeron 5305U has 2 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.30 GHz.
AMD EPYC 9224 Characteristic Intel Celeron 5305U
24 Cores 2
48 Threads 2
normal Core architecture normal
Yes Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
2.50 GHz Frequency 2.30 GHz
3.70 GHz Turbo Frequency (1 Core) --
3.65 GHz Turbo Frequency (All Cores) --

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.
AMD EPYC 9224 Characteristic Intel Celeron 5305U
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.
no iGPU GPU Intel UHD Graphics (Comet Lake)
GPU frequency 0.30 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) 0.90 GHz
-- GPU Generation 9.5
Technology 14 nm
Max. displays 3
-- Compute units 24
-- Shader 192
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory 32 GB
-- DirectX Version 12

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
no iGPU GPU Intel UHD Graphics (Comet Lake)
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC Decode / Encode
No Codec VC-1 Decode
No Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

The AMD EPYC 9224 supports a maximum of 6144 GB of memory in 12 memory channels. The Intel Celeron 5305U can connect up to 64 GB of memory in 2 memory channels.
AMD EPYC 9224 Characteristic Intel Celeron 5305U
DDR5-4800 Memory LPDDR3-2133, DDR4-2400
6144 GB Max. Memory 64 GB
12 Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
460.8 GB/s Max. Bandwidth 38.4 GB/s
Yes ECC No
24.00 MB L2 Cache --
64.00 MB L3 Cache 2.00 MB
5.0 PCIe version 2.0
128 PCIe lanes 12
504.1 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth 6.0 GB/s

Thermal Management

The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The AMD EPYC 9224 has a TDP of 200 W, that of the Intel Celeron 5305U is 15 W.
AMD EPYC 9224 Characteristic Intel Celeron 5305U
200 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 15 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
240 W TDP up --
-- TDP down 12.5 W
100 °C Tjunction max. 100 °C

Technical details

The AMD EPYC 9224 has a 88.00 MB cache, while the Intel Celeron 5305U cache has a total of 2.00 MB.
AMD EPYC 9224 Characteristic Intel Celeron 5305U
5 nm Technology 14 nm
Chiplet Chip design Monolithic
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2
SP5 Socket BGA 1528
AMD-V, SVM Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Yes AES-NI Yes
Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 Operating systems Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux
Q4/2022 Release date Q2/2020
1825 $ Release price 128 $
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the AMD EPYC 9224 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Intel Celeron 5305U to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD EPYC 9224 AMD EPYC 9224
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Celeron 5305U Intel Celeron 5305U
Intel UHD Graphics (Comet Lake) @ 0.90 GHz
361 (100%)

Devices using this processor
AMD EPYC 9224 Intel Celeron 5305U
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. AMD EPYC 9124AMD EPYC 9224 AMD EPYC 9124 vs AMD EPYC 9224
2. Intel Celeron 5305UIntel Celeron N2910 Intel Celeron 5305U vs Intel Celeron N2910
3. MediaTek Helio G35Intel Celeron 5305U MediaTek Helio G35 vs Intel Celeron 5305U
4. Intel Celeron 5305UIntel Xeon Gold 6338N Intel Celeron 5305U vs Intel Xeon Gold 6338N
5. AMD Ryzen 5 1600Intel Celeron 5305U AMD Ryzen 5 1600 vs Intel Celeron 5305U
6. AMD EPYC 9254AMD EPYC 9224 AMD EPYC 9254 vs AMD EPYC 9224
7. Intel Celeron 5305UAMD Ryzen 5 2500X Intel Celeron 5305U vs AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
8. AMD FX-4300Intel Celeron 5305U AMD FX-4300 vs Intel Celeron 5305U
9. AMD EPYC 9224Intel Core i9-13900K AMD EPYC 9224 vs Intel Core i9-13900K
10. AMD EPYC 7443PAMD EPYC 9224 AMD EPYC 7443P vs AMD EPYC 9224


back to index