AMD EPYC 9174F vs Samsung Exynos 5250
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD EPYC 9174F | Samsung Exynos 5250 | |
CPU comparisonAMD EPYC 9174F or Samsung Exynos 5250 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD EPYC 9174F has 16 cores with 32 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.40 GHz. Up to 6144 GB of memory is supported in 12 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 9174F was released in Q4/2022. The Samsung Exynos 5250 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.70 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 5250 was released in Q4/2011. |
||
| AMD EPYC (129) | Family | Samsung Exynos (47) |
| AMD EPYC 9004 (21) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 5250 (1) |
| 4 | Generation | 2 |
| Genoa / Genoa-X (Zen 4) | Architecture | Cortex-A15 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD EPYC 9174F has 16 CPU cores and can calculate 32 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 9174F is 4.10 GHz (4.40 GHz) while the Samsung Exynos 5250 has 2 CPU cores and 2 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Samsung Exynos 5250 is at 1.70 GHz. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9174F | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 5250 |
| 16 | Cores | 2 |
| 32 | Threads | 2 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 4.10 GHz | Frequency | 1.70 GHz |
| 4.40 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| 4.15 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The AMD EPYC 9174F or Samsung Exynos 5250 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-T604 MP4 |
| GPU frequency | 0.53 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | 0.53 GHz |
| -- | GPU Generation | Midgard 1 |
| Technology | 32nm | |
| Max. displays | 1 | |
| -- | Compute units | 4 |
| -- | Shader | 64 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| -- | DirectX Version | 11 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-T604 MP4 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD EPYC 9174F can use up to 6144 GB of memory in 12 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 460.8 GB/s. The Samsung Exynos 5250 supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to --. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9174F | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 5250 |
| DDR5-4800 | Memory | LPDDR3-800 |
| 6144 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 12 | Memory channels | 0 |
| 460.8 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| 16.00 MB | L2 Cache | 1.00 MB |
| 256.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 5.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 128 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 504.1 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD EPYC 9174F is 320 W, while the Samsung Exynos 5250 has a TDP of --. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9174F | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 5250 |
| 320 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| 400 W | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| 100 °C | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD EPYC 9174F is manufactured in 5 nm and has 272.00 MB cache. The Samsung Exynos 5250 is manufactured in 32 nm and has a 1.00 MB cache. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9174F | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 5250 |
| 5 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv7-A (32 bit) |
| SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI | ISA extensions | -- |
| SP5 | Socket | -- |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 | Operating systems | Android |
| Q4/2022 | Release date | Q4/2011 |
| 3850 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
16C 32T @ 4.10 GHz (4.40 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD EPYC 9174F
16C 32T @ 4.40 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 5250
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9174F
16C 32T @ 4.15 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5250
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9174F
16C 32T @ 4.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5250
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9174F
16C 32T @ 4.15 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5250
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9174F
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5250
ARM Mali-T604 MP4 @ 0.53 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD EPYC 9174F | Samsung Exynos 5250 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
