AMD EPYC 7742 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD EPYC 7742 CPU1 vs CPU2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
AMD EPYC 7742 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the AMD EPYC 7742 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the AMD EPYC 7742 64 core processor released in Q3/2019 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G which has 8 CPU cores and was introduced in Q1/2022.
AMD EPYC (129) Family Qualcomm Snapdragon (103)
AMD EPYC 7002 (24) CPU group Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (1)
2 Generation 9
Rome (Zen 2) Architecture Kryo 660
Desktop / Server Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD EPYC 7742 is a 64 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.25 GHz (3.40 GHz). The processor can compute 128 threads at the same time. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G clocks with 2.20 GHz, has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel.

AMD EPYC 7742 Characteristic Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
64 Cores 8
128 Threads 8
normal Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE)
Yes Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
2.25 GHz (3.40 GHz) A-Core 2.20 GHz
2x Kryo 660 Gold
-- B-Core 1.70 GHz
6x Kryo 660 Silver

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

AMD EPYC 7742 Characteristic Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

no iGPU GPU Qualcomm Adreno 619 (6nm)
GPU frequency 0.95 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) --
-- GPU Generation --
Technology 6 nm
Max. displays 0
-- Compute units --
-- Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory --
-- DirectX Version 12.1

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

no iGPU GPU Qualcomm Adreno 619 (6nm)
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode
No Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 Decode
No Codec VP8 Decode
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC Decode
No Codec VC-1 Decode
No Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

Up to GB of memory in a maximum of 8 memory channels is supported by the AMD EPYC 7742, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G supports a maximum of 6 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 17.0 GB/s enabled.

AMD EPYC 7742 Characteristic Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
DDR4-3200 Memory LPDDR4X-2133
Max. Memory 6 GB
8 (Octa Channel) Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
51.2 GB/s Max. Bandwidth 17.0 GB/s
Yes ECC No
-- L2 Cache --
256.00 MB L3 Cache --
4.0 PCIe version --
128 PCIe lanes --
252.0 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The AMD EPYC 7742 has a TDP of 225 W. The TDP of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

AMD EPYC 7742 Characteristic Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
225 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The AMD EPYC 7742 has 256.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 7 nm. The cache of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G is at 0.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 6 nm.

AMD EPYC 7742 Characteristic Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
7 nm Technology 6 nm
Chiplet Chip design Chiplet
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8-A (64 bit)
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 ISA extensions --
SP3 Socket --
AMD-V, SVM Virtualization None
Yes AES-NI No
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Android
Q3/2019 Release date Q1/2022
9000 $ Release price 250 $
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the AMD EPYC 7742 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 5.0 stars (1 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 3.8 stars (53 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (67%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 3 CPU benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (9%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD EPYC 7742 AMD EPYC 7742
64C 128T @ 3.40 GHz
1050 (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
669 (64%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD EPYC 7742 AMD EPYC 7742
64C 128T @ 2.80 GHz
37515 (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
1928 (5%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
AMD EPYC 7742 AMD EPYC 7742
64C 128T @ 3.40 GHz
1278 (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
894 (70%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
AMD EPYC 7742 AMD EPYC 7742
64C 128T @ 2.80 GHz
13647 (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
2044 (15%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD EPYC 7742 AMD EPYC 7742
64C 128T @ 2.80 GHz
65631 (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
4389 (7%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD EPYC 7742 AMD EPYC 7742
64C 128T @ 3.40 GHz
398 (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD EPYC 7742 AMD EPYC 7742
64C 128T @ 2.80 GHz
20644 (100%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
0 (0%)

AnTuTu 9 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
AMD EPYC 7742 AMD EPYC 7742
64C 128T @ 2.25 GHz
0 (0%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
361205 (100%)

Devices using this processor

AMD EPYC 7742 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
Unknown Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 845Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 720GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 778GQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 888Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5GMediaTek Helio G99 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G vs MediaTek Helio G99
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 855 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5GMediaTek Helio G96 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G vs MediaTek Helio G96
8. Qualcomm Snapdragon 870Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
9. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 860 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
10. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 765G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G


back to index