AMD EPYC 7702 vs Intel Core i7-965
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD EPYC 7702 | Intel Core i7-965 | |
CPU comparisonAMD EPYC 7702 or Intel Core i7-965 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD EPYC 7702 has 64 cores with 128 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.35 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7702 was released in Q3/2019. The Intel Core i7-965 has 4 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.46 GHz. The CPU supports up to 24 GB of memory in 3 memory channels. The Intel Core i7-965 was released in Q4/2008. |
||
| AMD EPYC (129) | Family | Intel Core i7 Extreme Edition (24) |
| AMD EPYC 7002 (24) | CPU group | Intel Core i7 900 (7) |
| 2 | Generation | 1 |
| Rome (Zen 2) | Architecture | Bloomfield |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD EPYC 7702 is a 64 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.00 GHz (3.35 GHz). The Intel Core i7-965 has 4 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 3.20 GHz (3.46 GHz). |
||
| AMD EPYC 7702 | Characteristic | Intel Core i7-965 |
| 64 | Cores | 4 |
| 128 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | Yes |
| 2.00 GHz | Frequency | 3.20 GHz |
| 3.35 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.46 GHz |
| 2.50 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD EPYC 7702 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The Intel Core i7-965 can connect up to 24 GB of memory in 3 memory channels. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7702 | Characteristic | Intel Core i7-965 |
| DDR4-3200 | Memory | DDR3-1066 |
| Max. Memory | 24 GB | |
| 8 (Octa Channel) | Memory channels | 3 |
| 51.2 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | 1.00 MB |
| 256.00 MB | L3 Cache | 8.00 MB |
| 4.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 128 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 252.0 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The AMD EPYC 7702 has a TDP of 200 W, that of the Intel Core i7-965 is 130 W. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7702 | Characteristic | Intel Core i7-965 |
| 200 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 130 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD EPYC 7702 has a 256.00 MB cache, while the Intel Core i7-965 cache has a total of 9.00 MB. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7702 | Characteristic | Intel Core i7-965 |
| 7 nm | Technology | 45 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Monolithic |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 |
| SP3 | Socket | LGA 1366 |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q3/2019 | Release date | Q4/2008 |
| 8000 $ | Release price | 990 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
64C 128T @ 2.00 GHz (3.35 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
4C 8T @ 3.20 GHz (3.46 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
|
Intel Core i7-965
4C 8T @ 3.46 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i7-965
4C 8T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i7-965
4C 8T @ 3.46 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i7-965
4C 8T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i7-965
4C 8T @ 3.46 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i7-965
4C 8T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i7-965
4C 8T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i7-965
4C 8T @ 3.46 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i7-965
4C 8T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i7-965
4C 8T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD EPYC 7702 | Intel Core i7-965 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
