AMD EPYC 7662 vs AMD EPYC 7702

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD EPYC 7662 CPU1 vs CPU2 AMD EPYC 7702
AMD EPYC 7662 AMD EPYC 7702

CPU comparison

AMD EPYC 7662 or AMD EPYC 7702 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The AMD EPYC 7662 has 64 cores with 128 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.30 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7662 was released in Q1/2020.

The AMD EPYC 7702 has 64 cores with 128 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.35 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7702 was released in Q3/2019.
AMD EPYC Family AMD EPYC
AMD EPYC 7002 CPU group AMD EPYC 7002
2 Generation 2
Rome (Zen 2) Architecture Rome (Zen 2)
Desktop / Server Segment Desktop / Server
-- Predecessor --
AMD EPYC 7763 Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD EPYC 7662 has 64 CPU cores and can calculate 128 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 7662 is 2.00 GHz (3.30 GHz) while the AMD EPYC 7702 has 64 CPU cores and 128 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 7702 is at --.

64 Cores 64
128 Threads 128
normal Core architecture normal
Yes Hyperthreading Yes
No Overclocking ? No
2.00 GHz Frequency 2.00 GHz
3.30 GHz Turbo Frequency (1 Core) 3.35 GHz
2.40 GHz Turbo Frequency (All Cores) 2.50 GHz

Internal Graphics

The AMD EPYC 7662 or AMD EPYC 7702 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.

no iGPU GPU no iGPU
GPU frequency
GPU (Turbo)
GPU Generation
Technology
Max. displays
Execution units
Shader
Max. GPU Memory
DirectX Version

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
No Codec h264 No
No Codec VP9 No
No Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC No
No Codec VC-1 No
No Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

The AMD EPYC 7662 can use up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is --. The AMD EPYC 7702 supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to --.

DDR4-3200 Memory DDR4-3200
Max. Memory
8 (Octa Channel) Memory channels 8 (Octa Channel)
-- Bandwidth --
Yes ECC Yes
L2 Cache
256.00 MB L3 Cache 256.00 MB
4.0 PCIe version 4.0
128 PCIe lanes 128

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD EPYC 7662 is 225 W, while the AMD EPYC 7702 has a TDP of 200 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently.

225 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 200 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The AMD EPYC 7662 is manufactured in 7 nm and has 256.00 MB cache. The AMD EPYC 7702 is manufactured in 7 nm and has a 256.00 MB cache.

7 nm Technology 7 nm
Chiplet Chip design Chiplet
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 ISA extensions SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
SP3 Socket SP3
AMD-V, SVM Virtualization AMD-V, SVM
Yes AES-NI Yes
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q1/2020 Release date Q3/2019
-- Release price 8000 $
show more data show more data



Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

AMD EPYC 7662 AMD EPYC 7662
64C 128T @ 3.30 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD EPYC 7702 AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz
996 (100%)
Show all Cinebench R23 (Single-Core) results



Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

AMD EPYC 7662 AMD EPYC 7662
64C 128T @ 2.40 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD EPYC 7702 AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz
49035 (100%)
Show all Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core) results



Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

AMD EPYC 7662 AMD EPYC 7662
64C 128T @ 3.30 GHz
386 (99%)
AMD EPYC 7702 AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz
391 (100%)
Show all Cinebench R20 (Single-Core) results



Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

AMD EPYC 7662 AMD EPYC 7662
64C 128T @ 2.40 GHz
18203 (97%)
AMD EPYC 7702 AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz
18857 (100%)
Show all Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core) results



Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

AMD EPYC 7662 AMD EPYC 7662
64C 128T @ 3.30 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD EPYC 7702 AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz
782 (100%)
Show all Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core) results



Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

AMD EPYC 7662 AMD EPYC 7662
64C 128T @ 2.40 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD EPYC 7702 AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz
11451 (100%)
Show all Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core) results



Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

AMD EPYC 7662 AMD EPYC 7662
64C 128T @ 2.40 GHz
61057 (98%)
AMD EPYC 7702 AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz
62410 (100%)
Show all Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark results



Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.

AMD EPYC 7662 AMD EPYC 7662
64C 128T @ 2.40 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD EPYC 7702 AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz
403.9 (100%)
Show all Blender 2.81 (bmw27) results



V-Ray CPU-Render Benchmark

V-Ray is a 3D rendering software from the manufacturer Chaos for designers and artists. Unlike many other render engines, V-Ray is capable of so-called hybrid rendering, in which the CPU and GPU work together at the same time.

However, the CPU benchmark we used (CPU Render Mode) only uses the system's processor. The working memory used plays a major role in the V-Ray benchmark. For our benchmarks we use the fastest RAM standard approved by the manufacturer (without overclocking).

Due to the high compatibility of V-Ray (including Autodesk 3ds Max, Maya, Cinema 4D, SketchUp, Unreal Engine and Blender), it is a frequently used software. With V-Ray, for example, photorealistic images can be rendered that laypeople cannot distinguish from normal photos.

AMD EPYC 7662 AMD EPYC 7662
64C 128T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD EPYC 7702 AMD EPYC 7702
64C 128T @ 2.00 GHz
38466 (100%)
Show all V-Ray CPU-Render Benchmark results



Devices using this processor

AMD EPYC 7662 AMD EPYC 7702
Unknown Unknown

Leaderboards

In our leaderboards, we have clearly compiled the best processors for specific categories for you. The leaderboards are always up to date and are regularly updated by us. The best processors are selected according to popularity and speed in benchmarks as well as the price-performance ratio.


Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. AMD EPYC 7742AMD EPYC 7702 AMD EPYC 7742 vs AMD EPYC 7702
2. Intel Xeon Gold 6140AMD EPYC 7702 Intel Xeon Gold 6140 vs AMD EPYC 7702
3. AMD EPYC 7702AMD EPYC 7702P AMD EPYC 7702 vs AMD EPYC 7702P
4. AMD EPYC 7742AMD EPYC 7662 AMD EPYC 7742 vs AMD EPYC 7662
5. AMD EPYC 7702PAMD EPYC 7662 AMD EPYC 7702P vs AMD EPYC 7662
6. AMD EPYC 7702AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X AMD EPYC 7702 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
7. AMD EPYC 7702Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 AMD EPYC 7702 vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8168
8. AMD EPYC 7702AMD EPYC 7502 AMD EPYC 7702 vs AMD EPYC 7502
9. AMD EPYC 7702Intel Xeon Gold 6138F AMD EPYC 7702 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6138F
10. AMD EPYC 7662AMD EPYC 7702 AMD EPYC 7662 vs AMD EPYC 7702
11. AMD EPYC 7702Intel Xeon Platinum 8176 AMD EPYC 7702 vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8176
12. AMD EPYC 7662Intel Xeon Gold 5218 AMD EPYC 7662 vs Intel Xeon Gold 5218
13. Intel Xeon Platinum 8380HLAMD EPYC 7702 Intel Xeon Platinum 8380HL vs AMD EPYC 7702
14. Intel Core i9-9900AMD EPYC 7702 Intel Core i9-9900 vs AMD EPYC 7702
15. AMD EPYC 7702AMD EPYC 7302 AMD EPYC 7702 vs AMD EPYC 7302


back to index