AMD EPYC 7662 vs Samsung Exynos 9810

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD EPYC 7662 CPU1 vs CPU2 Samsung Exynos 9810
AMD EPYC 7662 Samsung Exynos 9810

CPU comparison

AMD EPYC 7662 or Samsung Exynos 9810 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The AMD EPYC 7662 has 64 cores with 128 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.30 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7662 was released in Q1/2020.

The Samsung Exynos 9810 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.90 GHz. The CPU supports up to 8 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 9810 was released in Q1/2018.
AMD EPYC (129) Family Samsung Exynos (47)
AMD EPYC 7002 (24) CPU group Samsung Exynos 9810 (1)
2 Generation 3
Rome (Zen 2) Architecture Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Desktop / Server Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
AMD EPYC 7763 Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD EPYC 7662 is a 64 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.00 GHz (3.30 GHz). The Samsung Exynos 9810 has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.90 GHz.

AMD EPYC 7662 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 9810
64 Cores 8
128 Threads 8
normal Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE)
Yes Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
2.00 GHz (3.30 GHz) A-Core 2.90 GHz
4x Exynos M3 (Meerkat)
-- B-Core 1.90 GHz
4x Cortex-A55

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

AMD EPYC 7662 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 9810
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.

no iGPU GPU ARM Mali-G72 MP18
GPU frequency 0.85 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) 0.85 GHz
-- GPU Generation Bifrost 2
Technology 16 nm
Max. displays 2
-- Compute units 18
-- Shader 288
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory 2 GB
-- DirectX Version 12

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

no iGPU GPU ARM Mali-G72 MP18
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC Decode / Encode
No Codec VC-1 Decode / Encode
No Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

The AMD EPYC 7662 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 9810 can connect up to 8 GB of memory in 4 memory channels.

AMD EPYC 7662 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 9810
DDR4-3200 Memory LPDDR4X-1866
Max. Memory 8 GB
8 (Octa Channel) Memory channels 4 (Quad Channel)
51.2 GB/s Max. Bandwidth --
Yes ECC No
-- L2 Cache 2.25 MB
256.00 MB L3 Cache 4.00 MB
4.0 PCIe version --
128 PCIe lanes --
252.0 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The AMD EPYC 7662 has a TDP of 225 W, that of the Samsung Exynos 9810 is --.

AMD EPYC 7662 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 9810
225 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The AMD EPYC 7662 has a 256.00 MB cache, while the Samsung Exynos 9810 cache has a total of 6.25 MB.

AMD EPYC 7662 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 9810
7 nm Technology 10 nm
Chiplet Chip design Unknown
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8-A (64 bit)
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 ISA extensions --
SP3 Socket --
AMD-V, SVM Virtualization None
Yes AES-NI No
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Android
Q1/2020 Release date Q1/2018
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the AMD EPYC 7662 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Samsung Exynos 9810 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 4.0 stars (4 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7662 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 9810 (57%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7662 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 9810 (6%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD EPYC 7662 AMD EPYC 7662
64C 128T @ 3.30 GHz
1046 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 9810 Samsung Exynos 9810
8C 8T @ 2.90 GHz
601 (57%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD EPYC 7662 AMD EPYC 7662
64C 128T @ 2.40 GHz
33944 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 9810 Samsung Exynos 9810
8C 8T @ 2.90 GHz
1913 (6%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD EPYC 7662 AMD EPYC 7662
64C 128T @ 2.40 GHz
73144 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 9810 Samsung Exynos 9810
8C 8T @ 2.90 GHz
3714 (5%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
AMD EPYC 7662 AMD EPYC 7662
64C 128T @ 3.30 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 9810 Samsung Exynos 9810
8C 8T @ 2.90 GHz
417 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
AMD EPYC 7662 AMD EPYC 7662
64C 128T @ 2.40 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 9810 Samsung Exynos 9810
8C 8T @ 2.90 GHz
1480 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD EPYC 7662 AMD EPYC 7662
64C 128T @ 3.30 GHz
386 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 9810 Samsung Exynos 9810
8C 8T @ 2.90 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD EPYC 7662 AMD EPYC 7662
64C 128T @ 2.40 GHz
18203 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 9810 Samsung Exynos 9810
8C 8T @ 2.90 GHz
0 (0%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD EPYC 7662 AMD EPYC 7662
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 9810 Samsung Exynos 9810
ARM Mali-G72 MP18 @ 0.85 GHz
561 (100%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
AMD EPYC 7662 AMD EPYC 7662
64C 128T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 9810 Samsung Exynos 9810
8C 8T @ 2.90 GHz
313877 (100%)

Devices using this processor

AMD EPYC 7662 Samsung Exynos 9810
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 888Samsung Exynos 9810 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Samsung Exynos 9810
2. Samsung Exynos 9810Samsung Exynos 990 Samsung Exynos 9810 vs Samsung Exynos 990
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5GSamsung Exynos 9810 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G vs Samsung Exynos 9810
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 765GSamsung Exynos 9810 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Samsung Exynos 9810
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 730Samsung Exynos 9810 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 vs Samsung Exynos 9810
6. Samsung Exynos 9810Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G Samsung Exynos 9810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
7. Samsung Exynos 9810Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G Samsung Exynos 9810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
8. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855Samsung Exynos 9810 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs Samsung Exynos 9810
9. Samsung Exynos 9810Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G Samsung Exynos 9810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
10. Samsung Exynos 2100Samsung Exynos 9810 Samsung Exynos 2100 vs Samsung Exynos 9810


back to index