AMD EPYC 7662 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD EPYC 7662 | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 | |
CPU comparisonAMD EPYC 7662 or MediaTek Dimensity 9200 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD EPYC 7662 has 64 cores with 128 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.30 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7662 was released in Q1/2020. The MediaTek Dimensity 9200 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.05 GHz. The CPU supports up to 16 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The MediaTek Dimensity 9200 was released in Q4/2022. |
||
| AMD EPYC (129) | Family | Mediatek Dimensity (36) |
| AMD EPYC 7002 (24) | CPU group | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 (2) |
| 2 | Generation | 4 |
| Rome (Zen 2) | Architecture | Cortex-X3 / -A715 / -A510 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ |
| AMD EPYC 7763 | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD EPYC 7662 is a 64 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.00 GHz (3.30 GHz). The MediaTek Dimensity 9200 has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 3.05 GHz. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7662 | Characteristic | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 |
| 64 | Cores | 8 |
| 128 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.00 GHz (3.30 GHz) | A-Core | 3.05 GHz 1x Cortex-X3 |
| -- | B-Core | 2.85 GHz 3x Cortex-A715 |
| -- | C-Core | 1.80 GHz 4x Cortex-A510 |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Immortalis-G715 MP11 |
| GPU frequency | 0.98 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| -- | GPU Generation | Vallhall |
| Technology | 4 nm | |
| Max. displays | 0 | |
| -- | Compute units | 11 |
| -- | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| -- | DirectX Version | 12 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Immortalis-G715 MP11 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | Decode |
| No | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VC-1 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD EPYC 7662 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The MediaTek Dimensity 9200 can connect up to 16 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7662 | Characteristic | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 |
| DDR4-3200 | Memory | LPDDR5X-8533 |
| Max. Memory | 16 GB | |
| 8 (Octa Channel) | Memory channels | 4 (Quad Channel) |
| 51.2 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 68.3 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 256.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 4.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 128 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 252.0 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The AMD EPYC 7662 has a TDP of 225 W, that of the MediaTek Dimensity 9200 is --. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7662 | Characteristic | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 |
| 225 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD EPYC 7662 has a 256.00 MB cache, while the MediaTek Dimensity 9200 cache has a total of 0.00 MB. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7662 | Characteristic | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 |
| 7 nm | Technology | 4 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv9-A (64 bit) |
| SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 | ISA extensions | -- |
| SP3 | Socket | -- |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q1/2020 | Release date | Q4/2022 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
64C 128T @ 2.00 GHz (3.30 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 3.05 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD EPYC 7662
64C 128T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
8C 8T @ 3.05 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7662
64C 128T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
8C 8T @ 3.05 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7662
64C 128T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
8C 8T @ 3.05 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7662
64C 128T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
8C 8T @ 3.05 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7662
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
ARM Immortalis-G715 MP11 @ 0.98 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 9 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7662
64C 128T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
8C 8T @ 3.05 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7662
64C 128T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
8C 8T @ 3.05 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD EPYC 7662 | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
