Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
AMD EPYC 7552 vs Intel Processor N200
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
AMD EPYC 7552
100 %
48C / 96T · 3.30 GHz
Intel Processor N200
91 %
4C / 4T · 3.70 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
AMD EPYC 7552
100 %
48C / 96T · 2.50 GHz
4C / 4T · 3.40 GHz
More benchmarks
Cinebench 2024 (SC)
427 entries
427 entries
Cinebench 2024 (MC)
422 entries
422 entries
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
3DMark Timespy (iGPU)
534 entries
534 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
V-Ray CPU-Render
251 entries
251 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
AMD EPYC 7552 | Intel Processor N200 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD EPYC (147) | Intel Processor N (9) |
| CPU group | AMD EPYC 7002 (25) | Intel Processor N50/N100/N200 (5) |
| Architecture | Rome (Zen 2) | Alder Lake N |
| Technology | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Segment | Server | Notebook |
| Socket | SP3 | BGA |
| Predecessor | AMD EPYC 7551 | |
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
AMD EPYC 7552 | Intel Processor N200 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 48 / 96 | 4 / 4 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✓ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 48x | 4x Gracemont |
| Frequency: | 2.20 GHz | 1.80 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 3.30 GHz | 3.70 GHz |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 2.50 GHz | 3.40 GHz |
| L2-Cache | 4.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 192.00 MB | 6.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
AMD EPYC 7552 | Intel Processor N200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | no iGPU | Intel UHD Graphics 32 EUs (Alder Lake) |
| GPU frequency | 0.40 - 0.75 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | / | 32 / 256 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 8 GB | |
| Technology | 10 nm | |
| Release date | Q1/2023 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
AMD EPYC 7552 | Intel Processor N200 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
AMD EPYC 7552 | Intel Processor N200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR4-3200 (51.2 GB/s) | LPDDR5-4800 (38.4 GB/s) DDR5-4800 (38.4 GB/s) DDR4-3200 (25.6 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 16 GB | |
| Memory channels | 8 | 1 |
| ECC | Yes | No |
| PCIe | 4.0 x 128 | 3.0 x 9 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 252.0 GB/s | 8.9 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
AMD EPYC 7552 | Intel Processor N200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200 W | 6 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
AMD EPYC 7552 | Intel Processor N200 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Chiplet | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2 |
| Release date | Q3/2019 | Q1/2023 |
| Release price | 7000 $ | 193 $ |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of AMD EPYC 7552 is 5.0 stars (1 ratings), while Intel Processor N200 has received 3.4 stars (105 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
AMD EPYC 7552
48C / 96T · 3.30 GHz
2
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
3
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
4
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
7
Apple M4 (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 4.46 GHz
8
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
9
Intel Processor N200
4C / 4T · 3.70 GHz
Popular Comparisons
