AMD EPYC 7502P vs Samsung Exynos 7420

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD EPYC 7502P CPU1 vs CPU2 Samsung Exynos 7420
AMD EPYC 7502P Samsung Exynos 7420

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the AMD EPYC 7502P and the Samsung Exynos 7420 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the AMD EPYC 7502P 32 core processor released in Q3/2019 with the Samsung Exynos 7420 which has 8 CPU cores and was introduced in Q2/2015.
AMD EPYC (129) Family Samsung Exynos (47)
AMD EPYC 7002 (24) CPU group Samsung Exynos 7420 (1)
2 Generation 1
Rome (Zen 2) Architecture Cortex-A57 / Cortex-A53
Desktop / Server Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD EPYC 7502P is a 32 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.50 GHz (3.35 GHz). The processor can compute 64 threads at the same time. The Samsung Exynos 7420 clocks with 2.10 GHz, has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel.

AMD EPYC 7502P Characteristic Samsung Exynos 7420
32 Cores 8
64 Threads 8
normal Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE)
Yes Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
2.50 GHz (3.35 GHz) A-Core 2.10 GHz
4x Cortex-A57
-- B-Core 1.50 GHz
4x Cortex-A53

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

AMD EPYC 7502P Characteristic Samsung Exynos 7420
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

no iGPU GPU ARM Mali-T760 MP8
GPU frequency 0.70 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) 0.77 GHz
-- GPU Generation Midgard 3
Technology 28nm
Max. displays 2
-- Compute units 8
-- Shader 128
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory --
-- DirectX Version 11

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

no iGPU GPU ARM Mali-T760 MP8
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
No Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 No
No Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC No
No Codec VC-1 No
No Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

Up to GB of memory in a maximum of 8 memory channels is supported by the AMD EPYC 7502P, while the Samsung Exynos 7420 supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of -- enabled.

AMD EPYC 7502P Characteristic Samsung Exynos 7420
DDR4-3200 Memory LPDDR4-1600
Max. Memory
8 (Octa Channel) Memory channels 0
51.2 GB/s Max. Bandwidth --
Yes ECC No
-- L2 Cache 0.51 MB
128.00 MB L3 Cache --
4.0 PCIe version --
128 PCIe lanes --
252.0 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The AMD EPYC 7502P has a TDP of 180 W. The TDP of the Samsung Exynos 7420 is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

AMD EPYC 7502P Characteristic Samsung Exynos 7420
180 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The AMD EPYC 7502P has 128.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 7 nm. The cache of Samsung Exynos 7420 is at 0.51 MB. The processor is manufactured in 14 nm.

AMD EPYC 7502P Characteristic Samsung Exynos 7420
7 nm Technology 14 nm
Chiplet Chip design Unknown
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8-A (64 bit)
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 ISA extensions --
SP3 Socket --
AMD-V, SVM Virtualization None
Yes AES-NI No
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Android
Q3/2019 Release date Q2/2015
4250 $ Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the AMD EPYC 7502P to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Samsung Exynos 7420 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 3.3 stars (3 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7502P (100%)
Samsung Exynos 7420 (22%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 3 CPU benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7502P (100%)
Samsung Exynos 7420 (4%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD EPYC 7502P AMD EPYC 7502P
32C 64T @ 3.35 GHz
1042 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 7420 Samsung Exynos 7420
8C 8T @ 2.10 GHz
244 (23%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD EPYC 7502P AMD EPYC 7502P
32C 64T @ 3.00 GHz
28314 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 7420 Samsung Exynos 7420
8C 8T @ 2.10 GHz
945 (3%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
AMD EPYC 7502P AMD EPYC 7502P
32C 64T @ 3.35 GHz
1314 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 7420 Samsung Exynos 7420
8C 8T @ 2.10 GHz
280 (21%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
AMD EPYC 7502P AMD EPYC 7502P
32C 64T @ 3.00 GHz
13349 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 7420 Samsung Exynos 7420
8C 8T @ 2.10 GHz
850 (6%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD EPYC 7502P AMD EPYC 7502P
32C 64T @ 3.00 GHz
49744 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 7420 Samsung Exynos 7420
8C 8T @ 2.10 GHz
1618 (3%)

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD EPYC 7502P AMD EPYC 7502P
32C 64T @ 3.35 GHz
1021 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 7420 Samsung Exynos 7420
8C 8T @ 2.10 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD EPYC 7502P AMD EPYC 7502P
32C 64T @ 3.00 GHz
36403 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 7420 Samsung Exynos 7420
8C 8T @ 2.10 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD EPYC 7502P AMD EPYC 7502P
32C 64T @ 3.35 GHz
391 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 7420 Samsung Exynos 7420
8C 8T @ 2.10 GHz
0 (0%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD EPYC 7502P AMD EPYC 7502P
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 7420 Samsung Exynos 7420
ARM Mali-T760 MP8 @ 0.77 GHz
210 (100%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
AMD EPYC 7502P AMD EPYC 7502P
32C 64T @ 2.50 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 7420 Samsung Exynos 7420
8C 8T @ 2.10 GHz
112550 (100%)

Devices using this processor

AMD EPYC 7502P Samsung Exynos 7420
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. AMD Ryzen 9 5950XAMD EPYC 7502P AMD Ryzen 9 5950X vs AMD EPYC 7502P
2. AMD EPYC 7502PAMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD EPYC 7502P vs AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
3. AMD EPYC 7502PAMD EPYC 7532 AMD EPYC 7502P vs AMD EPYC 7532
4. AMD EPYC 7502PIntel Xeon Gold 6242 AMD EPYC 7502P vs Intel Xeon Gold 6242
5. AMD EPYC 7502PAMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X AMD EPYC 7502P vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
6. Intel Xeon W-2295AMD EPYC 7502P Intel Xeon W-2295 vs AMD EPYC 7502P
7. AMD EPYC 7452AMD EPYC 7502P AMD EPYC 7452 vs AMD EPYC 7502P
8. AMD EPYC 7502PIntel Core i9-9900K AMD EPYC 7502P vs Intel Core i9-9900K
9. AMD EPYC 7502PAMD EPYC 7702P AMD EPYC 7502P vs AMD EPYC 7702P
10. AMD EPYC 7402PAMD EPYC 7502P AMD EPYC 7402P vs AMD EPYC 7502P


back to index