AMD EPYC 7343 vs MediaTek Helio A22
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD EPYC 7343 | MediaTek Helio A22 | |
CPU comparisonAMD EPYC 7343 or MediaTek Helio A22 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD EPYC 7343 has 16 cores with 32 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.90 GHz. Up to 4096 GB of memory is supported in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7343 was released in Q1/2021. The MediaTek Helio A22 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.00 GHz. The CPU supports up to 6 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The MediaTek Helio A22 was released in Q1/2018. |
||
| AMD EPYC (129) | Family | Mediatek Helio (37) |
| AMD EPYC 7003 (29) | CPU group | MediaTek Helio A22 (1) |
| 3 | Generation | 1 |
| Milan (Zen 3) | Architecture | Cortex-A53 / Cortex-A53 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD EPYC 7343 is a 16 core processor with a clock frequency of 3.20 GHz (3.90 GHz). The MediaTek Helio A22 has 4 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.00 GHz. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7343 | Characteristic | MediaTek Helio A22 |
| 16 | Cores | 4 |
| 32 | Threads | 4 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 3.20 GHz | Frequency | 2.00 GHz |
| 3.90 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| 3.60 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Internal GraphicsThe integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | PowerVR GE8300 |
| GPU frequency | 0.65 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| -- | GPU Generation | -- |
| Technology | 20 nm | |
| Max. displays | 1 | |
| -- | Compute units | 1 |
| -- | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB |
| -- | DirectX Version | 10 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | PowerVR GE8300 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD EPYC 7343 supports a maximum of 4096 GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The MediaTek Helio A22 can connect up to 6 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7343 | Characteristic | MediaTek Helio A22 |
| DDR4-3200 | Memory | LPDDR4X-3200, LPDDR3-1866 |
| 4096 GB | Max. Memory | 6 GB |
| 8 (Octa Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 204.8 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 12.8 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 128.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 4.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 128 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 252.0 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The AMD EPYC 7343 has a TDP of 190 W, that of the MediaTek Helio A22 is --. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7343 | Characteristic | MediaTek Helio A22 |
| 190 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| 200 W | TDP up | -- |
| 165 W | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD EPYC 7343 has a 128.00 MB cache, while the MediaTek Helio A22 cache has a total of 0.00 MB. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7343 | Characteristic | MediaTek Helio A22 |
| 7 nm | Technology | 16 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 | ISA extensions | -- |
| SP3 | Socket | -- |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q1/2021 | Release date | Q1/2018 |
| 1565 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
16C 32T @ 3.20 GHz (3.90 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD EPYC 7343
16C 32T @ 3.90 GHz |
||
|
MediaTek Helio A22
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7343
16C 32T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Helio A22
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7343
16C 32T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Helio A22
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7343
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Helio A22
PowerVR GE8300 @ 0.65 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 9 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7343
16C 32T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Helio A22
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7343
16C 32T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Helio A22
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD EPYC 7343 | MediaTek Helio A22 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
