AMD EPYC 7252 vs Intel Atom N475
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD EPYC 7252 | Intel Atom N475 | |
CPU comparisonIn this CPU comparison, we compare the AMD EPYC 7252 and the Intel Atom N475 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the AMD EPYC 7252 8 core processor released in Q3/2019 with the Intel Atom N475 which has 1 CPU cores and was introduced in Q1/2010. |
||
| AMD EPYC (129) | Family | Intel Atom (108) |
| AMD EPYC 7002 (24) | CPU group | Intel Atom N400/N500 (3) |
| 2 | Generation | 2 |
| Rome (Zen 2) | Architecture | Pineview |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD EPYC 7252 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 3.10 GHz (3.20 GHz). The processor can compute 16 threads at the same time. The Intel Atom N475 clocks with 1.83 GHz, has 1 CPU cores and can calculate 2 threads in parallel. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7252 | Characteristic | Intel Atom N475 |
| 8 | Cores | 1 |
| 16 | Threads | 2 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 3.10 GHz | Frequency | 1.83 GHz |
| 3.20 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| 3.20 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Internal GraphicsGraphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | Intel GMA 3150 |
| GPU frequency | 0.20 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| -- | GPU Generation | -- |
| Technology | 45 | |
| Max. displays | 0 | |
| -- | Compute units | 2 |
| -- | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | 1 GB |
| -- | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | Intel GMA 3150 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeUp to GB of memory in a maximum of 8 memory channels is supported by the AMD EPYC 7252, while the Intel Atom N475 supports a maximum of 2 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 6.4 GB/s enabled. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7252 | Characteristic | Intel Atom N475 |
| DDR4-3200 | Memory | DDR3-800, DDR2-800 |
| Max. Memory | 2 GB | |
| 8 (Octa Channel) | Memory channels | 1 (Single Channel) |
| 51.2 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | 0.50 MB |
| 64.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 4.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 128 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 252.0 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe AMD EPYC 7252 has a TDP of 120 W. The TDP of the Intel Atom N475 is 6.5 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7252 | Characteristic | Intel Atom N475 |
| 120 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 6.5 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | 100 °C |
Technical detailsThe AMD EPYC 7252 has 64.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 7 nm. The cache of Intel Atom N475 is at 0.50 MB. The processor is manufactured in 45 nm. |
||
| AMD EPYC 7252 | Characteristic | Intel Atom N475 |
| 7 nm | Technology | 45 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Monolithic |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 | ISA extensions | MMX, SSE3, SSSE3 |
| SP3 | Socket | BGA 559 |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q3/2019 | Release date | Q1/2010 |
| 790 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
8C 16T @ 3.10 GHz (3.20 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
1C 2T @ 1.83 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 0 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
AMD EPYC 7252
8C 16T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
Intel Atom N475
1C 2T @ 1.83 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7252
8C 16T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Atom N475
1C 2T @ 1.83 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7252
8C 16T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Atom N475
1C 2T @ 1.83 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD EPYC 7252
8C 16T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Atom N475
1C 2T @ 1.83 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD EPYC 7252 | Intel Atom N475 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
