Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
AMD E-350D vs Intel Core i5-10400F
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
More benchmarks
Cinebench 2026 (ST)
218 entries
218 entries
Cinebench 2026 (MC)
219 entries
219 entries
Cinebench 2024 (SC)
427 entries
427 entries
Cinebench 2024 (MC)
422 entries
422 entries
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
Blender 3.1 Benchmark
213 entries
213 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (SC)
250 entries
250 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Monero Hashrate
94 entries
94 entries
V-Ray CPU-Render
251 entries
251 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
AMD E-350D | Intel Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD E (23) | Intel Core i5 (336) |
| CPU group | AMD E/E1/E2-1000 (5) | Intel Core i 10000 (43) |
| Architecture | Zacate (Bobcat) | Comet Lake S |
| Technology | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Desktop |
| Socket | BGA 413 | LGA 1200 |
| Predecessor | Intel Core i5-9400F | |
| Successor | Intel Core i5-11400F |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
AMD E-350D | Intel Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 6 / 12 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✓ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 2x | 6x |
| Frequency: | 1.60 GHz | 2.90 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 4.30 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 4.00 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 1.00 MB | 12.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
AMD E-350D | Intel Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | AMD Radeon HD 6310 | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | 0.49 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | 1 / 80 | / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 1 GB | |
| Technology | 40 nm | |
| Release date | Q4/2010 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
AMD E-350D | Intel Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
AMD E-350D | Intel Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1600 (12.8 GB/s) | DDR4-2666 (42.7 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 128 GB | |
| Memory channels | 1 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 16 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 15.8 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
AMD E-350D | Intel Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 18 W | 65 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 100 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
AMD E-350D | Intel Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Unknown | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 |
| Release date | Q3/2010 | Q2/2020 |
| Release price | 157 $ | |
| Documents |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of AMD E-350D is 4.0 stars (3 ratings), while Intel Core i5-10400F has received 3.9 stars (82 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
5
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
6
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
7
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
8
AMD E-350D
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
9
Intel Core i5-10400F
6C / 12T · 4.30 GHz
Popular Comparisons
