Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
AMD E-300 vs Intel Celeron 1037U
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
AMD E-300
28 %
2C / 2T · 1.30 GHz
Intel Celeron 1037U
100 %
2C / 2T · 1.80 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
AMD E-300
26 %
2C / 2T · 1.30 GHz
Intel Celeron 1037U
100 %
2C / 2T · 1.80 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
AMD E-300
82 %
AMD Radeon HD 6310
Intel Celeron 1037U
100 %
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1)
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
AMD E-300
23 %
2C / 2T · 1.30 GHz
Intel Celeron 1037U
100 %
2C / 2T · 1.80 GHz
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
AMD E-300 | Intel Celeron 1037U |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD E (23) | Intel Celeron (165) |
| CPU group | AMD E/E1/E2-1000 (5) | Intel Celeron 1000 (9) |
| Architecture | Zacate (Bobcat) | Ivy Bridge U |
| Technology | 32 nm | 22 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Notebook |
| Socket | BGA 413 | BGA 1023 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
AMD E-300 | Intel Celeron 1037U |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 2x | 2x |
| Frequency: | 1.30 GHz | 1.80 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | ||
| Turbo (All Cores): | ||
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 1.00 MB | 2.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
AMD E-300 | Intel Celeron 1037U |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | AMD Radeon HD 6310 | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) |
| GPU frequency | 0.49 GHz | 0.35 - 1.00 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 1 / 80 | 6 / 48 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 2 | 3 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Technology | 40 nm | 22 nm |
| Release date | Q4/2010 | Q4/2012 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
AMD E-300 | Intel Celeron 1037U |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
AMD E-300 | Intel Celeron 1037U |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1066 (8.5 GB/s) | DDR3L-1600 (25.6 GB/s) DDR3-1600 (25.6 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 32 GB | |
| Memory channels | 1 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 2.0 x 16 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 8.0 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
AMD E-300 | Intel Celeron 1037U |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 18 W | 17 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
AMD E-300 | Intel Celeron 1037U |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Unknown | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 |
| Release date | Q3/2011 | Q1/2013 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of AMD E-300 is 2.9 stars (11 ratings), while Intel Celeron 1037U has received 4.2 stars (6 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
3
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
4
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
7
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
8
Intel Celeron 1037U
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
9
AMD E-300
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
