AMD C-50 vs AMD EPYC 7F52

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD C-50 CPU1 vs CPU2 AMD EPYC 7F52
AMD C-50 AMD EPYC 7F52

CPU comparison

AMD C-50 or AMD EPYC 7F52 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The AMD C-50 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.00 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 1 memory channels. The AMD C-50 was released in Q1/2011.

The AMD EPYC 7F52 has 16 cores with 32 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.90 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7F52 was released in Q2/2020.
AMD C (6) Family AMD EPYC (129)
AMD C (6) CPU group AMD EPYC 7002 (24)
1 Generation 2
Ontario (Bobcat) Architecture Rome (Zen 2)
Mobile Segment Desktop / Server
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD C-50 is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.00 GHz. The AMD EPYC 7F52 has 16 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 3.50 GHz (3.90 GHz).

AMD C-50 Characteristic AMD EPYC 7F52
2 Cores 16
2 Threads 32
normal Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading Yes
Yes Overclocking ? No
1.00 GHz Frequency 3.50 GHz
-- Turbo Frequency (1 Core) 3.90 GHz
-- Turbo Frequency (All Cores) 3.70 GHz

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

AMD C-50 Characteristic AMD EPYC 7F52
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.

AMD Radeon HD 6250 GPU no iGPU
0.28 GHz GPU frequency --
-- GPU (Turbo) --
3 GPU Generation --
40 nm Technology
2 Max. displays
1 Compute units --
80 Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
1 GB Max. GPU Memory --
11 DirectX Version --

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

AMD Radeon HD 6250 GPU no iGPU
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode Codec h264 No
No Codec VP9 No
No Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
Decode Codec AVC No
Decode Codec VC-1 No
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

The AMD C-50 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 1 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7F52 can connect up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels.

AMD C-50 Characteristic AMD EPYC 7F52
DDR3-1066 Memory DDR4-3200
Max. Memory
1 (Single Channel) Memory channels 8 (Octa Channel)
8.5 GB/s Max. Bandwidth 51.2 GB/s
No ECC Yes
-- L2 Cache --
1.00 MB L3 Cache 256.00 MB
-- PCIe version 4.0
-- PCIe lanes 128
-- PCIe Bandwidth 252.0 GB/s

Thermal Management

The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The AMD C-50 has a TDP of 9 W, that of the AMD EPYC 7F52 is 240 W.

AMD C-50 Characteristic AMD EPYC 7F52
9 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 240 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The AMD C-50 has a 1.00 MB cache, while the AMD EPYC 7F52 cache has a total of 256.00 MB.

AMD C-50 Characteristic AMD EPYC 7F52
40 nm Technology 7 nm
Unknown Chip design Chiplet
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE3, SSE4a ISA extensions SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
BGA 413 Socket SP3
AMD-V Virtualization AMD-V, SVM
No AES-NI Yes
Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q1/2011 Release date Q2/2020
-- Release price 3100 $
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the AMD C-50 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 1.0 stars (3 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the AMD EPYC 7F52 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
AMD C-50 (8%)
AMD EPYC 7F52 (100%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
AMD C-50 (1%)
AMD EPYC 7F52 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD C-50 AMD C-50
2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz
91 (8%)
AMD EPYC 7F52 AMD EPYC 7F52
16C 32T @ 3.90 GHz
1166 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD C-50 AMD C-50
2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz
162 (1%)
AMD EPYC 7F52 AMD EPYC 7F52
16C 32T @ 3.70 GHz
14477 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD C-50 AMD C-50
2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz
33 (7%)
AMD EPYC 7F52 AMD EPYC 7F52
16C 32T @ 3.90 GHz
446 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD C-50 AMD C-50
2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz
446 (1%)
AMD EPYC 7F52 AMD EPYC 7F52
16C 32T @ 3.70 GHz
41028 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD C-50 AMD C-50
2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz
42 (100%)
AMD EPYC 7F52 AMD EPYC 7F52
16C 32T @ 3.70 GHz
0 (0%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD C-50 AMD C-50
AMD Radeon HD 6250 @ 0.28 GHz
45 (100%)
AMD EPYC 7F52 AMD EPYC 7F52
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
AMD C-50 AMD C-50
2C 2T @ 1.00 GHz
73 (100%)
AMD EPYC 7F52 AMD EPYC 7F52
16C 32T @ 3.50 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

AMD C-50 AMD EPYC 7F52
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. AMD C-50AMD A4-1200 AMD C-50 vs AMD A4-1200
2. AMD C-50AMD A6-3420M AMD C-50 vs AMD A6-3420M
3. AMD C-50Intel Celeron N2810 AMD C-50 vs Intel Celeron N2810
4. Intel Core i5-4360UAMD C-50 Intel Core i5-4360U vs AMD C-50
5. Intel Core i3-3240TAMD C-50 Intel Core i3-3240T vs AMD C-50
6. Intel Celeron N2840AMD C-50 Intel Celeron N2840 vs AMD C-50
7. Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3AMD C-50 Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 vs AMD C-50
8. AMD G-T48LAMD C-50 AMD G-T48L vs AMD C-50
9. Intel Celeron 1007UAMD C-50 Intel Celeron 1007U vs AMD C-50
10. Intel Celeron N2930AMD C-50 Intel Celeron N2930 vs AMD C-50


back to index