Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
AMD A8-4500M vs Apple A10 Fusion
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
AMD A8-4500M
41 %
4C / 4T · 2.80 GHz
Apple A10 Fusion
100 %
4C / 4T · 2.34 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
AMD A8-4500M
59 %
4C / 4T · 2.80 GHz
Apple A10 Fusion
100 %
4C / 4T · 2.34 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
AMD A8-4500M
100 %
AMD Radeon HD 7640G
Apple A10 Fusion
98 %
Apple A10
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
118 entries
118 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
AMD A8-4500M | Apple A10 Fusion |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD A (112) | Apple A series (27) |
| CPU group | AMD A8-4000M (2) | Apple A10/A10X (2) |
| Architecture | Trinity (Piledriver) | A10 |
| Technology | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | FS1r2 | |
| Predecessor | Apple A9 | |
| Successor | Apple A11 Bionic |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
AMD A8-4500M | Apple A10 Fusion |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 4x 1.90 - 2.80 GHz |
2x Hurricane 2.34 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 2x Zephyr 1.09 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 3.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 4.00 MB | 4.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
AMD A8-4500M | Apple A10 Fusion |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | AMD Radeon HD 7640G | Apple A10 |
| GPU frequency | 0.50 - 0.69 GHz | 0.90 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 4 / 256 | 24 / 192 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 2 | 1 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Technology | 32 nm | 16 nm |
| Release date | Q2/2012 | Q3/2016 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
AMD A8-4500M | Apple A10 Fusion |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
AMD A8-4500M | Apple A10 Fusion |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1600 (25.6 GB/s) | LPDDR4-3200 (25.6 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 3 GB | |
| Memory channels | 2 | 1 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | ||
| PCIe Bandwidth |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
AMD A8-4500M | Apple A10 Fusion |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35 W | 5 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
AMD A8-4500M | Apple A10 Fusion |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Unknown | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | iOS | |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 | |
| Release date | Q2/2012 | Q3/2016 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of AMD A8-4500M is 3.8 stars (10 ratings), while Apple A10 Fusion has received 3.7 stars (74 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
3
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
4
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
7
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
8
AMD A8-4500M
4C / 4T · 2.80 GHz
9
Apple A10 Fusion
4C / 4T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
