AMD A8-3800 vs Samsung Exynos 5250
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD A8-3800 | Samsung Exynos 5250 | |
CPU comparisonAMD A8-3800 or Samsung Exynos 5250 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD A8-3800 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.70 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The AMD A8-3800 was released in Q3/2011. The Samsung Exynos 5250 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.70 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 5250 was released in Q4/2011. |
||
| AMD A (112) | Family | Samsung Exynos (47) |
| AMD A8-3000 (4) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 5250 (1) |
| 1 | Generation | 2 |
| Llano (K10) | Architecture | Cortex-A15 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD A8-3800 has 4 CPU cores and can calculate 4 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD A8-3800 is 2.40 GHz (2.70 GHz) while the Samsung Exynos 5250 has 2 CPU cores and 2 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Samsung Exynos 5250 is at 1.70 GHz. |
||
| AMD A8-3800 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 5250 |
| 4 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 2 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| Yes | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.40 GHz | Frequency | 1.70 GHz |
| 2.70 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| 2.70 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The AMD A8-3800 or Samsung Exynos 5250 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| AMD Radeon HD 6550D | GPU | ARM Mali-T604 MP4 |
| 0.60 GHz | GPU frequency | 0.53 GHz |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | 0.53 GHz |
| 3 | GPU Generation | Midgard 1 |
| 32 nm | Technology | 32nm |
| 2 | Max. displays | 1 |
| 5 | Compute units | 4 |
| 400 | Shader | 64 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| 1 GB | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 11 | DirectX Version | 11 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| AMD Radeon HD 6550D | GPU | ARM Mali-T604 MP4 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| Decode | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| Decode | Codec AVC | No |
| Decode | Codec VC-1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD A8-3800 can use up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 25.6 GB/s. The Samsung Exynos 5250 supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to --. |
||
| AMD A8-3800 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 5250 |
| DDR3-1600 | Memory | LPDDR3-800 |
| Max. Memory | ||
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 0 |
| 25.6 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| No | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | 1.00 MB |
| 4.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| -- | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD A8-3800 is 65 W, while the Samsung Exynos 5250 has a TDP of --. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| AMD A8-3800 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 5250 |
| 65 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD A8-3800 is manufactured in 32 nm and has 4.00 MB cache. The Samsung Exynos 5250 is manufactured in 32 nm and has a 1.00 MB cache. |
||
| AMD A8-3800 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 5250 |
| 32 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
| Unknown | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv7-A (32 bit) |
| SSE3, SSE4a | ISA extensions | -- |
| FM1 | Socket | -- |
| AMD-V | Virtualization | None |
| No | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q3/2011 | Release date | Q4/2011 |
| 130 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
4C 4T @ 2.40 GHz (2.70 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
AMD A8-3800
AMD Radeon HD 6550D @ 0.60 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 5250
ARM Mali-T604 MP4 @ 0.53 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD A8-3800
4C 4T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5250
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD A8-3800
4C 4T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5250
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD A8-3800
4C 4T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5250
2C 2T @ 1.70 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD A8-3800 | Samsung Exynos 5250 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
