Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
AMD A8-3500M vs Intel Celeron J4025
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
AMD A8-3500M
50 %
4C / 4T · 2.40 GHz
Intel Celeron J4025
100 %
2C / 2T · 2.90 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
AMD A8-3500M
79 %
4C / 4T · 2.40 GHz
Intel Celeron J4025
100 %
2C / 2T · 2.90 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
AMD A8-3500M
100 %
AMD Radeon HD 6620G
Intel Celeron J4025
38 %
Intel UHD Graphics 600
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Cinebench R11.5 iGPU
383 entries
383 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
AMD A8-3500M | Intel Celeron J4025 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD A (112) | Intel Celeron (165) |
| CPU group | AMD A6-3000M (9) | Intel Celeron J4000/N4000/N5000 (11) |
| Architecture | Llano (K10) | Gemini Lake |
| Technology | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Notebook |
| Socket | FS1 | BGA 1090 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
AMD A8-3500M | Intel Celeron J4025 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 4x | 2x |
| Frequency: | 1.50 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 2.40 GHz | 2.90 GHz |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 2.40 GHz | 2.90 GHz |
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 4.00 MB | 4.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✓ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
AMD A8-3500M | Intel Celeron J4025 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | AMD Radeon HD 6620G | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
| GPU frequency | 0.44 GHz | 0.25 - 0.70 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 5 / 400 | 12 / 96 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 2 | 3 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Technology | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Release date | Q2/2011 | Q4/2017 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
AMD A8-3500M | Intel Celeron J4025 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
AMD A8-3500M | Intel Celeron J4025 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1333 (21.3 GB/s) | LPDDR4-2400 (38.4 GB/s) DDR4-2400 (38.4 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 8 GB | |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 2.0 x 6 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 3.0 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
AMD A8-3500M | Intel Celeron J4025 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35 W | 10 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
AMD A8-3500M | Intel Celeron J4025 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Unknown | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE3, SSE4a | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 |
| Release date | Q2/2011 | Q4/2019 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of AMD A8-3500M is 4.5 stars (4 ratings), while Intel Celeron J4025 has received 3.1 stars (18 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
3
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
4
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
7
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
8
AMD A8-3500M
4C / 4T · 2.40 GHz
9
Intel Celeron J4025
2C / 2T · 2.90 GHz
Popular Comparisons
