Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
AMD A6-1450 vs Intel Core i3-7100
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
AMD A6-1450
24 %
AMD Radeon HD 8250
Intel Core i3-7100
100 %
Intel HD Graphics 630
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Multi-core performance
AMD A6-1450
25 %
4C / 4T · 1.40 GHz
Intel Core i3-7100
100 %
2C / 4T · 3.90 GHz
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (SC)
250 entries
250 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Cinebench R11.5 iGPU
383 entries
383 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
AMD A6-1450 | Intel Core i3-7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD A (112) | Intel Core i3 (205) |
| CPU group | AMD A6-1000 (1) | Intel Core i 7000 (17) |
| Architecture | Kabini (Jaguar) | Kaby Lake S |
| Technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Desktop |
| Socket | FT3 | LGA 1151 |
| Predecessor | Intel Core i3-6100 | |
| Successor | Intel Core i3-8100 |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
AMD A6-1450 | Intel Core i3-7100 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 2 / 4 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✓ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 4x | 2x |
| Frequency: | 1.00 GHz | 3.90 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 1.40 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 1.40 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 2.00 MB | 3.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✓ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
AMD A6-1450 | Intel Core i3-7100 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | AMD Radeon HD 8250 | Intel HD Graphics 630 |
| GPU frequency | 0.30 - 0.40 GHz | 0.35 - 1.10 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 2 / 128 | 24 / 192 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 2 | 3 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | 64 GB |
| Technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Release date | Q2/2013 | Q2/2016 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
AMD A6-1450 | Intel Core i3-7100 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
AMD A6-1450 | Intel Core i3-7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3L-1066 (17.1 GB/s) | DDR4-2400 (38.4 GB/s) DDR3-1600 (25.6 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 64 GB | |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 16 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 15.8 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
AMD A6-1450 | Intel Core i3-7100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 8 W | 51 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 100 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
AMD A6-1450 | Intel Core i3-7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Unknown | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 |
| Release date | Q2/2013 | Q1/2017 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of AMD A6-1450 is 3.2 stars (5 ratings), while Intel Core i3-7100 has received 3.8 stars (46 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
3
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
4
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
5
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
6
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
7
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
8
Intel Core i3-7100
2C / 4T · 0.00 GHz
9
AMD A6-1450
4C / 4T · 1.40 GHz
Popular Comparisons
